Skip to content

Add happy container with rtgtools - #327

Merged
georgiakes merged 8 commits into
devfrom
add-happy-rtgtools-image
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

georgiakes merged 8 commits into
devfrom
add-happy-rtgtools-image

Conversation

@georgiakes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/variantbenchmarking branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core pipelines lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 92e3b67

+| ✅ 305 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   3 tests were ignored |#
#| ❔   1 tests had warnings |#
!| ❗   1 tests had warnings |!
Details

❗ Test warnings:

❔ Tests ignored:

  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-variantbenchmarking_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-variantbenchmarking_logo_dark.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: .gitignore or .prettierignore

❔ Tests fixed:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 4.1.0
  • Run at 2026-10-01 08:45:37

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ nf-test failed with latest Nextflow version

Note

Tests with Nextflow's latest version failed but it will not cause a CI workflow failure.
Please check if the failure is expected with newer (edge-)releases of Nextflow or if it needs fixing.

  • ❌ docker | latest-everything | Shard 5/7

See the full run for details.

Comment thread conf/modules.config
withName: "HAPPY_HAPPY" {
ext.prefix = {params.truth_id ? "${meta.id}.${params.truth_id}.${meta.caller}" : "${meta.id}.truth.${meta.caller}" }
//ext.args = {""}
ext.args = { params.happy_comparison_engine != "default" ? "--engine=${params.happy_comparison_engine}" : "" }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did you to try to run it with all engine options?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just to see everything runs smooth for happy + reppy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested only the default which it the xcmp and the vcfeval.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is worth to check, as comparison_method uses happy_comparison_engine directly and in rep.py module you mention comparison module should be either "happy" or "vcfeval" https://github.com/nf-core/variantbenchmarking/blob/dev/modules/nf-core/happy/report/meta.yml

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get issues related to the happy code that have been unanswered form 2023 https://github.com/Illumina/hap.py/issues/181

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a formatting issue

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the solution could be excluding those enginees for the pipeline and we can link the reasoning as this github issue.

Comment thread nextflow_schema.json Outdated
Comment thread conf/tests/test_ga4gh.config
@georgiakes
georgiakes merged commit e44e239 into dev Oct 1, 2026
61 of 69 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants