Skip to content

fix(Migration): properly check for an existing index - #3163

Merged
blizzz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/3142/index-condition
Oct 26, 2026
Merged

blizzz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/3142/index-condition

Conversation

@blizzz

@blizzz blizzz commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🏁 Checklist

  • ⛑️ Tests (unit and/or integration) are included or not needed
  • 🔙 Backport requests are created or not needed: /backport to stableX.X
  • 📅 Milestone is set
  • 🌸 PR title is meaningful (if it should be in the changelog: is it meaningful to users?)

🤖 AI (if applicable)

  • The content of this PR was partly or fully generated using AI

Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
@blizzz
blizzz requested review from a team, luka-nextcloud and samin-z October 26, 2026 13:07
@blizzz
blizzz requested a review from enjeck as a code owner October 26, 2026 13:07
@blizzz blizzz added bug Something isn't working 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Oct 26, 2026
@blizzz blizzz linked an issue Oct 26, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@blizzz
blizzz merged commit ca6e5a1 into main Oct 26, 2026
98 of 100 checks passed
@blizzz
blizzz deleted the fix/3142/index-condition branch October 26, 2026 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade issues with the Tables app

2 participants