Repository navigation
bulky hook detection ignores the case of the font name - #35423
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
 |
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check |  |
The description contains only a follow-up reference to an earlier pull request (#34945). It does not state the problem, the motivation, or the fix. It also omits the template's Resolves issue line, an… |
Add a Resolves line that links the issue, or explain why no issue exists. Describe the problem: bulky hook detection compared font names case-sensitively. Explain the motivation and the fix: the font name is lowercased before comparison. Re… |
-
Check name Status Explanation Title check The title "bulky hook detection ignores the case of the font name" matches the change. The diff lowercases the engraving font name in slurPos before the Gonville and MuseJazz comparison, so bulky-hook… Docstring Coverage Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat… Linked Issues check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Out of Scope Changes check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Full details: Title check
-
Explanation
The title "bulky hook detection ignores the case of the font name" matches the change. The diff lowercases the engraving font name in slurPos before the Gonville and MuseJazz comparison, so bulky-hook selection no longer depends on capitalization. The title is short, specific, and states the main point. It does not mention the added stringutils include, which is a minor detail.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files.
-
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The description contains only a follow-up reference to an earlier pull request (
#34945). It does not state the problem, the motivation, or the fix. It also omits the template's Resolves issue line, and the checklist items are not marked. The template requires a short description and motivation, so the description is largely incomplete.Resolution
Add a Resolves line that links the issue, or explain why no issue exists. Describe the problem: bulky hook detection compared font names case-sensitively. Explain the motivation and the fix: the font name is lowercased before comparison. Reference the earlier pull request and explain what it left unresolved. Complete the checklist, and mark the AI assistance item if AI tools were used.
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Warning
Linked repositories: Public OSS repositories can only analyze public repositories installed in this organization. No linked repositories were analyzed; skipped musescore/muse_framework.git.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
follow up of #34945