Conversation
Co-Authored-By: GPT-5 <noreply@openai.com>
Co-Authored-By: GPT-5 <noreply@openai.com>
kixelated
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 20, 2026 17:56
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 48 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (51)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Contributor
Verdict: request changes |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Problem
The gateway crates exposed stringly paths and durations, catch-all
anyhowerrors, and constructors that retained resources they only used when building routers. Their public shapes also diverged frommoq-netand from each other.Approach
PathOwned,Duration, andUrlat gateway boundaries.Clientbuilder.AsPathin room claims.Impact
This is a breaking Rust API change for
moq-rtmp,moq-srt,moq-rtc,moq-hls,moq-stats, andmoq-room. SRT handshake rejection wire behavior now carries the verdict-specific extended code. There is no MoQ wire-format change.Alternatives
The SRT dial API could have retained free functions over a public config, but a
Clientkeeps configuration private and matches the other gateway clients. HLS could have introduced a URL/path enum, but acceptingUrldirectly keeps parsing at the caller boundary.Testing
just check: passed.moq-rtc44/44,moq-rtmp195/195,moq-hls86/86,moq-room15/15, andmoq-srt21/21 passed.just test: 4,530 tests passed before an unrelatedmoq-uringworker setup failed with OS error 12 (Cannot allocate memory), cancelling 210 tests. The exact failed test passed when rerun alone.just test smoke-full: 24/32 pairs passed. Both JS-native subscribers (Node and Bun) timed out against all four publishers after connecting and receiving the announcement; every Rust, Python, Go, JS, C, and GStreamer subscriber pairing passed.Follow-ups
(written by GPT-5)