Skip to content

Add MCP Observatory CI check - #4392

Closed
KryptosAI wants to merge 5 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
KryptosAI:codex/mcp-observatory-ci
Closed

KryptosAI wants to merge 5 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
KryptosAI:codex/mcp-observatory-ci

Conversation

@KryptosAI

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This adds a lightweight MCP Observatory check for the reference server-everything MCP server.\n\nWhy it helps:\n\n- verifies MCP tools, prompts, and resources still respond correctly\n- catches schema drift and common security footguns before release\n- posts a readable PR report for maintainers\n- gives users a compatibility signal when evaluating MCP servers\n\nI validated the target locally with:\n\nbash\nnpx @kryptosai/mcp-observatory@latest test --target mcp-observatory.target.json --security --deep\n\n\nResult: passed, with 13 tools, 4 prompts, and 7 resources detected from npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything@latest.\n\nIt runs in GitHub Actions and does not require an MCP Observatory account. If this is too broad for the repo, I can scope it differently or adjust the workflow.

@KryptosAI

This comment was marked as spam.

@KryptosAI

This comment was marked as spam.

@cliffhall cliffhall added the closed-out-of-scope Closed: out of scope here; listings and new servers go to the MCP Registry (#4875) label Oct 20, 2026
@cliffhall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for this pull request, and apologies for the long wait for a response.

These servers are reference implementations: they exist to show how each part of MCP is used, not to be general-purpose products, so new features are taken selectively, and this change isn't one the maintainers plan to take. This repository also now accepts issues, not pull requests, from anyone but its maintainers; the policy is in CONTRIBUTING.md.

This is not a judgment on the idea or on you. A server in the MCP Registry may well offer it, and anyone is welcome to build on these servers to do so. If you think we've misread it, please open an issue describing the problem and the expected behavior.

This is part of the backlog triage in #4875.

@cliffhall cliffhall closed this Oct 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

closed-out-of-scope Closed: out of scope here; listings and new servers go to the MCP Registry (#4875)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants