Fix Helm cleanup ordering for AKS destroy - #19243
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
🚀 Dogfood this PR with:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/aspire/main/eng/scripts/get-aspire-cli-pr.sh | bash -s -- 19243Or
iex "& { $(irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/aspire/main/eng/scripts/get-aspire-cli-pr.ps1) } 19243" |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds AKS destroy ordering so Kubernetes cleanup acquires credentials before Helm/cert-manager teardown and Azure deletion runs last.
Changes:
- Tags and orders Kubernetes cleanup steps per AKS environment.
- Adds destroy-specific credential acquisition.
- Expands dependency-graph and deployment E2E coverage.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
AzureKubernetesInfrastructureTests.cs |
Tests destroy dependency graphs. |
AksWithHelmChartDeploymentTests.cs |
Tests destroy with an empty kubeconfig. |
KubernetesHelmChartExtensions.cs |
Tags external-chart cleanup. |
HelmDeploymentEngine.cs |
Defines destroy tags for Helm cleanup. |
CertManagerExtensions.cs |
Tags issuer cleanup. |
AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.cs |
Orders credentials, cleanup, and Azure deletion. |
AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs |
Adds destroy credential acquisition. |
Suppressed comments (2)
src/Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Kubernetes/AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs:312
- This call cannot complete in a destroy-only graph. Pipeline step creation initializes this resource's
ProvisioningTaskCompletionSource, but the new credential step deliberately does not depend on the provisioning step;GetAksCredentialsAsyncthen callsNameOutputReference.GetValueAsync, which waits on that never-completed task. Read/hydrate the saved AKSnameoutput directly for destroy (without awaiting provisioning) and pass it into the credential routine.
await GetAksCredentialsAsync(context).ConfigureAwait(false);
src/Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Kubernetes/AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs:304
- Azure state can still exist after the resource-group delete has started because that step uses
WaitUntil.Started, and the original Helm failure leaves overall state uncleared. On a retry after AKS has disappeared, this check enters credential acquisition and fails before the idempotent Azure destroy step can report that the group is already gone. Treat a missing AKS cluster/resource group as a successful no-op in the destroy credential step so partial-teardown retries can finish.
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(resourceGroupName) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(subscriptionId))
PR Testing ReportPR Information
Artifact Version Verification
The CLI was installed from the PR's Changes AnalyzedFiles Changed
Change Categories
Test Scenarios ExecutedScenario 1: PR artifact identity and fresh AKS AppHostObjective: Verify that testing uses the artifact containing the PR changes and that a fresh AppHost can consume the PR AKS package. Coverage Type: Artifact and build validation Status: Passed Steps:
Evidence:
Observations:
Scenario 2: Safe AKS destroy without deployment stateObjective: Verify that a never-deployed AKS AppHost can be destroyed safely without ambient Kubernetes credentials or Azure deployment state. Coverage Type: Unhappy path Status: Passed Steps:
Evidence:
Expected Unhappy-Path Outcome: Credential acquisition, Helm teardown, and Azure deletion should each recognize missing persisted state and complete safely. Observations:
Scenario 3: AKS cluster-cleanup dependency graphObjective: Verify the dogfood artifact exposes the intended destroy topology for the main release, an opted-in external Helm chart, and cert-manager resources. Coverage Type: Boundary and topology validation Status: Passed Steps:
Evidence:
Observations:
Scenario 4: Focused source regression suitesObjective: Verify the PR source passes the affected Azure Kubernetes and Kubernetes hosting test projects. Coverage Type: Automated regression Status: Passed Steps:
Evidence:
Observations:
Scenario Not ExecutedLive AKS deploy and destroy with empty kubeconfigStatus: Not run This scenario provisions billable Azure resources and requires explicit approval. No user was available to approve cloud provisioning, so testing stopped short of the live deployment. The updated deployment E2E test remains the appropriate end-to-end validation for this path. Summary
Overall ResultPARTIALLY VERIFIED All non-provisioning artifact and source scenarios passed. The live AKS deployment scenario is still required to verify the original failure against a real cluster with an empty ambient kubeconfig. |
|
Retrying the failed CI jobs for this pull request from the CI run attempt. The rerun is being tracked in the rerun attempt. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: a5fbe5fe-6726-431d-af32-692b54aa1c2b
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: a5fbe5fe-6726-431d-af32-692b54aa1c2b
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (1)
src/Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Kubernetes/AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs:344
- When persisted AKS state is incomplete, returning here leaves
KubernetesEnvironment.KubeConfigPathunset, but all tagged cleanup steps still run. External chart uninstall falls back to its configured release name, and cert-manager issuer deletion always invokeskubectl, so both will use the caller's ambient kubeconfig and can delete resources from an unrelated cluster—the behavior this change is intended to eliminate. Fail this prerequisite (or otherwise prevent the downstream cleanup steps from executing) instead of continuing without an isolated kubeconfig.
context.Logger.LogInformation(
"No complete Azure deployment state found for AKS environment '{EnvironmentName}'. Skipping credential acquisition.",
Name);
return;
|
Retrying the failed CI jobs for this pull request from the CI run attempt. The rerun is being tracked in the rerun attempt. |
James Newton-King (JamesNK)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Two destroy-path correctness issues remain at 3bb5670509: incomplete persisted state can send cleanup to the ambient Kubernetes context, and adopted AKS resources ignore their persisted resource-specific Azure scope. The existing --clear-cache E2E coverage issue is already tracked in a separate thread and was not duplicated.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: a5fbe5fe-6726-431d-af32-692b54aa1c2b
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: a5fbe5fe-6726-431d-af32-692b54aa1c2b
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Suppressed comments (1)
src/Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Kubernetes/AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs:345
- The destroy path always uses the app-wide Azure subscription/resource group, but AKS can target an existing cluster in a different scope via
AsExistingInResourceGrouporScope. In that supported scenario, credential acquisition now targets the app resource group (or skips when global Azure state is absent) instead of the cluster scope, so Helm cleanup still fails or reaches the wrong cluster. Apply the same explicit-scope precedence used by the deploy credential path, while using persisted state only as its fallback.
var resourceGroupName = stateSection.Data["ResourceGroup"]?.ToString();
var subscriptionId = stateSection.Data["SubscriptionId"]?.ToString();
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 13 out of 13 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (1)
src/Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Kubernetes/AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.AksPipeline.cs:428
- A malformed persisted
Scopeaborts the credential prerequisite, which also prevents the dependentdestroy-azure-*step from deleting the resource group.Scopeis optional cached state elsewhere, and the already-validatedclusterResourceIdcontains the exact subscription and resource group, so use it as the safe fallback instead of blocking aggregate destroy.
catch (Exception ex) when (ex is not OperationCanceledException)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
$"The Azure deployment state for AKS environment '{Name}' contains an invalid scope.",
ex);
|
Retrying the failed CI jobs for this pull request from the CI run attempt. The rerun is being tracked in the rerun attempt. |
Mitch Denny (mitchdenny)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good — the destroy ordering fix is sound: tagging cluster-scoped cleanup steps and making destroy-azure-* depend on them is the right shape, and the destroy-only credential step correctly avoids pulling provisioning into the destroy graph.
Three non-blocking follow-ups:
AzureKubernetesEnvironmentResource.csuses.Single()for theAzureEnvironmentResourceand thedestroy-azure-*step. Every other call site in the repo usesSingleOrDefault/FirstOrDefaultwith a guard — safe in practice sinceAddAzureProvisioningalways adds it, but a mis-shaped model would surface an opaque "Sequence contains no elements".AksResourceExistsAsyncthrows on any nonzeroaz resource listexit. If the resource group itself was deleted out-of-band, that'sResourceGroupNotFound, which fails the credential step and blocks the entire destroy including Azure cleanup. Probably worth treating a missing RG the same as a missing cluster.- The E2E test dropped the
helm list -n podinfoassertion, so destroy is now only verified by pipeline success. Understandable given the cluster is gone by then, but it's lost coverage on theWithDestroy()contract.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: a5fbe5fe-6726-431d-af32-692b54aa1c2b
|
Addressed the three follow-ups from review 5108517925 in c303691:
The Azure Kubernetes suite passes 110/110, and the deployment E2E project builds with no warnings or errors. |
Tests selector5 / 99 PR test projects · 2 PR jobs · 2 advisory-only targets, from 14 changed files. Selected PR test projects (5 / 99)
Selected PR jobs (2)
Advisory workflow impact (2)
How these were chosen — grouped by what changed🔧 🔧 🔧 🔧 🔧 🔧 🧪 🧪 🧪 🧪 🧪 🧪 🧪 Job reasons
Selection computed for commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The destroy graph, persisted-state handling, retry behavior, and real deployment scenario are comprehensively covered.
Review details
- Files reviewed: 13/13 changed files
- Comments generated: 0 new
- Review effort level: Balanced
|
Retrying the failed CI jobs for this pull request from the CI run attempt. The rerun is being tracked in the rerun attempt. |
|
Retrying the failed CI jobs for this pull request from the CI run attempt. The rerun is being tracked in the rerun attempt. |
Documents the new destroy-specific AKS credential acquisition from microsoft/aspire#19243, which lets 'aspire destroy' tear down AKS deployments without relying on the caller's ambient kubectl context. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Pull request created: #1620
|
|
📝 Documentation has been drafted in microsoft/aspire.dev#1620 targeting Added a "Clean up resources" section to the AKS deployment doc covering
Note This draft PR needs human review before merging. |
|
The CI build failed due to test failure(s) that appear unrelated to the PR changes. These may be flaky tests. Suspected flaky test(s):
Suggested actions:
You can re-run the failed jobs from the workflow run page. |
…ps (#1780) ## Summary <!-- Describe what this pull request changes and why. --> Reconcile the 13.6 wiki audit and **all 25 open `docs-from-code` proposals targeting `release/13.6`** against the actual release source. Add missing canonical guidance rather than putting all coverage in What's new. This is a new, isolated feature PR into `release/13.6`; it does not update the release rollup #1599, merge or close another proposal, or push directly to a release branch. **Draft with explicit remaining packaging/validation gates:** the six REPL walkthroughs are source-verified, but current publicly available 13.6 packages do not contain the late `WithRepl` exports. Generated API catalogs have deliberately not been fabricated or refreshed from 14.x. See the open checklist below. ### Evidence baseline - Documentation base: `717442f6666948bcf77f3d704dc2dadf7c080ec2`. - Product source of truth: [`microsoft/aspire@e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/tree/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d), current `release/13.6` at audit time. Source was read from that Git object, not the stale source working directory. - [13.6 wiki](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/wiki/13.6-Change-log) snapshot `8e01a371d4f16a1306e48174d4cf1fdeca714348`, whose cutoff is product PR 20511. Later backports 20541/20546/20548 are included here. - Proposal base branches alone were **not** used as proof of release membership. Direct ancestry and known release backports were checked. Four fallback-targeted proposals are excluded below. - Wiki link corrections: its REPL link #1752 actually covers Sandboxes; the REPL proposal is #1740. Its AOT link #1714 covers PFX certificates, not AOT. ### Complete audit-gap checklist Checked items mean documentation coverage is implemented, not that cloud deployment or every product runtime scenario was executed. - [x] **1. Dotnet API graduation:** correct removal to **13.6**, not 14.0, in What's new, both Dotnet guides, and the diagnostic page; preserve the prerelease package caveat. This applies to core `AddDotnetProject`, `DotnetProjectResource`, and related `WithBuildEnvironment` overloads, not all uses of the diagnostic. Source: microsoft/aspire#20496. - [x] **2. Sandboxes:** remove obsolete API suppressions in the article and deployment guide while preserving Azure service preview/access and prerelease package limitations. Source: microsoft/aspire#20483. - [x] **3. Docked REPL documentation:** all six PostgreSQL/MySQL/MongoDB/SQL Server/Redis/Valkey guides plus the article now cover opt-in `WithRepl`/`withRepl`, run-only availability, actual client privileges, credential handling, and explicit exit versus closing a viewer. Source: microsoft/aspire#20419, backport of microsoft/aspire#20231. Package-backed checks remain open below. - [x] **4. Terminal CLI flag:** update current 13.6 article, `with-terminal`, and all three terminal command references. Preserve `terminals.v1` and experimental hosting API distinctions. Current configuration/schema data had no flag entry to remove; historical 13.5 notes remain historical. Source: microsoft/aspire#20548. - [x] **5. First-party Rust:** rewrite both canonical Rust guides around `Aspire.Hosting.Rust`; document Cargo versus application arguments, typed targets, debugging, generated Dockerfiles, workspace context, ABI constraints, and Toolkit migration. Bacon remains explicitly Toolkit-only. Add exact first-party package mapping. Source: microsoft/aspire#18906 and current Rust README. - [x] **6. Agent setup:** align command reference, skills guide, AI-agent guide, and article on MCP opt-in, `--mcp`, chained/non-interactive behavior, seven-skill catalog, Project v2 migration, and Copilot app detection. Also fix stale default-selection text: all applicable bundle skills are preselected; companion tools remain opt-in. Sources: microsoft/aspire#19893, microsoft/aspire#20405, microsoft/aspire#19820. - [x] **7. Deno AppHost runtime:** document Deno 2+ detection, commands, permissions, native watch/type checking, doctor, and `DENO_CERT`, separately from Deno guest hosting. Source: microsoft/aspire#18627, distinct from microsoft/aspire#18628. - [x] **8. Native AOT / Fluent UI v5:** concise article, dashboard exploration, and standalone guidance; automatic packaged-dashboard selection, no invented performance figures. Source: microsoft/aspire#19565 and release packaging sources. - [x] **9. NuGet:** document bundled in-process operations, credential providers, non-interactive authentication, and realistic troubleshooting. Correct the proposal's `dotnet nuget locals` authentication advice: cache commands do not authenticate a feed. Source: microsoft/aspire#20391. - [x] **10. Multithreaded builds:** article and coordinated-build guide explain `-mt`, SDK detection, distinct project/file-based SDK floors, and fallback. Source: microsoft/aspire#20441. - [x] **11. Radius:** add a real deployment guide with C#/TypeScript setup, recipe-backed connections versus local endpoints, per-resource credential behavior, unauthenticated Redis limitation, secret exposure boundaries, and actionable runtime diagnostics 070–091. Wire navigation and exact package mapping. Source: microsoft/aspire#19555 and release README. - [x] **12. Connection aliases:** replace contradictory no-encoding guidance, retain composed logical-key-first lookup and portable-target behavior, explain collision detection and custom-publisher metadata. Source: microsoft/aspire#19729. - [x] **13. Connector Namespace / Toolbox / provisioning:** add Connector Namespace walkthrough, security/consent/revocation limits and mapping/sidebar; add Foundry Toolbox walkthrough, connection properties, roles, index prerequisites, approval enforcement boundaries, immutable versions, and existing-resource behavior. Extend existing Azure provisioning guide without a duplicate page. Sources: microsoft/aspire#19024, microsoft/aspire#17742, microsoft/aspire#20131. - [x] **14. Remaining high-impact items:** article covers opt-in manifest-aware DNX and new-template CLI bundling (existing SDK guides retained), migration skill and Copilot app detection; canonical inline `CsiVolumeSourceV1`/`VolumeV1.Csi` example, management links, Cosmos vNext telemetry, and AI Inference `GetModelInfoAsync`/`/info` health checks with `DisableHealthChecks`. No Azure OpenAI health-check claim. Sources: microsoft/aspire#19310, microsoft/aspire#19076, microsoft/aspire#19826, microsoft/aspire#20070, microsoft/aspire#15671, microsoft/aspire#15969. - [x] **15. All 25 proposal dispositions:** listed below, including newer dashboard backports and four exclusions. Existing Sandbox inference coverage is retained rather than copied from a stale draft. - [ ] **16. Refresh generated API/catalog/Twoslash data from an official post-backport 13.6 build.** Existing `26473.12`/`a11eca96` data remains untouched. The newest public `dotnet9` feed package checked, `13.6.0-preview.1.26474.10` at `43496a2a306c81c862c947b11b4f4e5494b6fe08`, still has no Redis `WithRepl` in its actual package XML. Do not use 14.x, hand-edit declarations, or attribute source changes to older binaries. - [ ] **Validate the six REPL examples against that actual post-backport SDK and running clients.** Their new TypeScript fences are plain TypeScript, not annotated with unsupported Twoslash data. No existing diagnostics are allowlisted or suppressed; no generated API exports are fabricated. Enable Twoslash when the genuine catalog catches up. ### All 25 open proposal dispositions and provenance Text is selectively adapted from these proposals, not merged wholesale. #1778 and #1748 are authored by @sebastienros; the other proposals are authored by the Aspire repo bot. The table credits the associated product-change authors where supplied by the proposals. Existing PRs remain open and unchanged. | Docs PR | Release source / credited product author | Disposition | | --- | --- | --- | | #1778 | microsoft/aspire#19729 — @sebastienros | **Adopted:** canonical connection-string alias correction, including logical-first resolution and migration. | | #1771 | microsoft/aspire#20481 — @sebastienros | **Excluded:** flat polyglot feature keys are not in the audited release tip; no verified backport. Preserve release key names. | | #1770 | microsoft/aspire#20525 → microsoft/aspire#20548 — @mitchdenny | **Corrected/adopted:** command guides plus the still-current 13.6 article, which the proposal incorrectly treats as historical. | | #1769 | microsoft/aspire#20416 — @JamesNK | **Excluded:** brand hover change has no verified 13.6 membership/backport. | | #1768 | microsoft/aspire#20523 → microsoft/aspire#20546 — @JamesNK | **Adopted:** run pin/unpin preserves selector and current selection. | | #1766 | microsoft/aspire#20537 → microsoft/aspire#20541 — @mitchdenny | **Adopted:** terminal dock empty state. | | #1761 | microsoft/aspire#20490 → microsoft/aspire#20496 — @eerhardt | **Corrected:** graduation is 13.6, package remains prerelease, Blazor-specific exception retained. | | #1760 | microsoft/aspire#20436 — @eerhardt | **Excluded:** CLI net11/tools-any retarget is not in the audited release; no fallback-base inference. | | #1748 | microsoft/aspire#20131 — @sebastienros | **Adopted:** extend existing provisioning guide with service-specific models/lookups and projection limits. | | #1744 | microsoft/aspire#20337 → microsoft/aspire#20441 — @karolz-ms | **Adopted:** precise SDK-conditional multithreaded build coverage. | | #1740 | microsoft/aspire#20231 → microsoft/aspire#20419 — @mitchdenny | **Adapted:** all six guides; TypeScript-first tabs, source-verified lifecycle/security. Actual post-backport SDK/runtime gate is open above. | | #1738 | microsoft/aspire#20158 → microsoft/aspire#20405 — @karolz-ms | **Partly already covered / completed:** existing seven-skill catalog retained; add project migration guidance and correct command catalog/defaults. Do not misclassify the bundled skill as a companion tool. | | #1735 | microsoft/aspire#20334 — @karolz-ms | **Excluded:** enhanced startup errors are not in the audited release; no verified backport. | | #1731 | microsoft/aspire#19847 → microsoft/aspire#20391 — @eerhardt | **Corrected/adopted:** in-process NuGet and real authenticated-restore troubleshooting, not cache-command authentication. | | #1719 | microsoft/aspire#20299 → microsoft/aspire#20407 — @JamesNK | **Corrected/adopted:** cookie naming/scoping; identical names can collide but do not guarantee cross-dashboard cookie decryptability or shared sign-in. | | #1664 | microsoft/aspire#20011 — @maddymontaquila | **Adopted:** concise Azure environment icon release note. | | #1628 | microsoft/aspire#17742 — @davidfowl | **Adapted/expanded:** canonical Toolbox examples, consumer contract, role/index prerequisites, approval/security and concurrency limits. | | #1623 | microsoft/aspire#19810 — @mitchdenny | **Already covered:** current Sandbox guide/article already describe compute inference, explicit selection and external endpoints. Preserve that guidance while removing obsolete suppressions. | | #1620 | microsoft/aspire#19243 — @sebastienros | **Adapted:** AKS credential-before-Helm cleanup and destructive-operation warning; omit misleading ambient-context workaround. | | #1614 | microsoft/aspire#19870 — @sebastienros | **Adopted:** typed callback handle behavior in extension authoring and article. | | #1574 | microsoft/aspire#19430 — @mitchdenny | **Adapted:** canonical hostname inheritance, explicit-host precedence, catch-all default backend. | | #1570 | microsoft/aspire#19590 — @karolz-ms | **Adopted:** Dev Tunnel URL regression troubleshooting. | | #1565 | microsoft/aspire#19429 — @mitchdenny | **Corrected/adopted:** Helm embedded parameters with real `refExpr` and `addParameter(name, { value })`, not stringifying a handle or using an invalid actual-SDK overload. | | #1564 | microsoft/aspire#19026 — @karolz-ms | **Corrected/adopted:** C#/TypeScript Dotnet gateway walkthrough. Retain both experimental diagnostics; remove obsolete run-only restriction after microsoft/aspire#19997 publishing support. Avoid imported ambiguous API reference. | | #1499 | microsoft/aspire#19248 — @IEvangelist | **Adopted:** describe exact secret-value redaction and embedded-secret limit; release article already covered the fix. | ### Important source-verified corrections to proposals / earlier audit assumptions - [`BlazorGatewayExtensions.cs`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/blob/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d/src/Aspire.Hosting.Blazor/BlazorGatewayExtensions.cs): `AddDotnetProjectBlazorGateway` and the Dotnet `WithBlazorClientApp` overload still carry `ASPIREDOTNETPROJECT001`; the class carries `ASPIREBLAZOR001`. They share `WithBlazorClientAppCore`/`WithBlazorApp` and the publish-companion path. Thus neither blanket diagnostic retirement nor the proposal's old run-only claim is correct. - [`SkillDefinition.cs`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/blob/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d/src/Aspire.Cli/Agents/SkillDefinition.cs) sets bundled skills' `IsDefault=true`; [`AgentInitCommand.cs`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/blob/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d/src/Aspire.Cli/Commands/AgentInitCommand.cs) selects the applicable catalog defaults for both flows. MCP has its own standalone-only binding. - [`TypeScriptAppHostToolchainResolver.cs`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/blob/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d/src/Aspire.Cli/Projects/TypeScriptAppHostToolchainResolver.cs) is the source for Deno flags and certificate variable; guest Deno hosting is separate. - [`Radius README`](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/blob/e8fd6fbb954f50ccd2e66479538392f65e13e71d/src/Aspire.Hosting.Radius/README.md) supplies the resource-specific credential rules and publish diagnostics, not assumptions about local endpoints. ## Third-party links and affiliations <!-- List third-party links and disclose material affiliations. --> Links point to official Microsoft Learn, VS Code Marketplace debugger extensions, Rust/Cargo/Bacon documentation, Radius documentation, and source repositories. No sponsorship, commercial endorsement, or affiliation claim is introduced. Maintainers should supply any personal affiliation disclosure required by policy; automation has not inferred one. ## Validation <!-- List the checks you ran or explain why validation isn't needed. --> - **97 passing focused unit checks** across API-reference authoring/rendering, Twoslash blocks, file-tree formatting, CLI configuration schema, SEO lengths, and resource catalog. - **82 passing structured-data checks**, including exact integration mapping uniqueness and page resolution. - **11 C# samples compile**, zero warnings/errors, using genuine `13.6.0-preview.1.26473.12` packages. Scope: Rust, Connector Namespace, Radius, Toolbox, inline CSI, Helm, Blazor gateway, and provisioning. `Projects.Api/Worker/Client` use compile-only `IProjectMetadata` stand-ins; no claim of running those apps or provisioning cloud resources. - **10 TypeScript samples pass `tsc`** under `strict`, `NodeNext`, and `ES2022` against three **unmodified actual SDK files**, not just the site's declaration bundle. The fixture uses the exact `e8fd6fbb` release `AtsCapabilityScanner` and genuine `26473.12` TypeSystem/code-generator/integration binaries, whose informational source is `a11eca96`. This is an isolated local generation fixture, **not** a claim that official CLI generation or a new packaged release was tested. An attempted restore with the older handed-off local CLI could not discover an AppHost server; the bounded direct generator fixture was used instead. - The SDK scan is **not globally warning-free**: it reports a Radius `withContainerImage` collision on `CSharpAppResource` and an App Configuration `createRoleAssignment` overload collision. None of the compiled examples calls those colliding methods; the warnings are retained in evidence, not suppressed, and no generated declarations were edited. - Browser: Connector Namespace, Radius, both Rust pages, Foundry hosting, and What's new return **HTTP 200**, correct headings, and no rendered Twoslash errors. New guide/article page-local anchors and the cross-page Blazor anchor resolve. Connector/Radius mobile layouts have no horizontal overflow; Connector language-tab interaction works. Standalone Astro preview emits expected `/api/live` 404s because StaticHost is not running. - `git diff --check` passes. No production `pnpm build`, cloud deployment, REPL runtime session, full product suite, or blanket validation of every pre-existing example was performed. - Generated C#/TypeScript API data, declaration bundles, integration catalogs, image catalogs, and contributor data are unchanged. Only the authored package-to-guide mapping is updated. **Before merging:** complete the two packaging/REPL checkboxes above, inspect CI, and obtain human review. This PR intentionally does not close or merge the source documentation proposals. --------- Co-authored-by: David Pine <7679720+IEvangelist@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Documents changes from microsoft/aspire#19243 `@sebastienros` Targeting `release/13.6` based on the source PR milestone `13.6`. ## Why The source PR fixes `aspire destroy` for AKS deployments so it no longer depends on the caller's ambient `kubectl` context: it now acquires AKS credentials for the target cluster itself before running Helm cleanup, and orders Helm release removal, opted-in external charts, and cert-manager teardown before the Azure resource group is deleted. The PR body includes a "User-facing usage" section and a `--apphost`/`--environment` CLI example, but the AKS docs page had no "Clean up resources" / destroy section at all — only a deploy-time reference to destroy-time uninstall behavior for external charts. ## What changed Added a new **Clean up resources** section to `deployment/kubernetes/aks.mdx` (after "Publish AKS artifacts", before "Azure-specific considerations") that: - Shows the basic `aspire destroy` command. - Explains that AKS credential acquisition is now independent of the ambient kubeconfig, and that Helm/cert-manager cleanup completes before the resource group is deleted. - Reproduces the PR's non-interactive `KUBECONFIG=$(mktemp) aspire destroy --apphost ... --environment ... --non-interactive --yes` example for CI/CD usage. - Cross-references the existing `aspire destroy` CLI command reference page. ## Files modified - `src/frontend/src/content/docs/deployment/kubernetes/aks.mdx` > Generated by [PR Documentation Check](https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/actions/runs/33902845128) for #19243 · auto · 63.4 AIC · ⌖ 7.73 AIC · ⊞ 19.7K · [◷](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Amicrosoft%2Faspire.dev+%22gh-aw-workflow-id%3A+pr-docs-check%22&type=pullrequests) <!-- gh-aw-agentic-workflow: PR Documentation Check, engine: copilot, model: auto, id: 33902845128, workflow_id: pr-docs-check, run: https://github.com/microsoft/aspire/actions/runs/33902845128 --> <!-- gh-aw-workflow-id: pr-docs-check --> <!-- gh-aw-workflow-call-id: microsoft/aspire/pr-docs-check --> --------- Co-authored-by: aspire-repo-bot[bot] <268009190+aspire-repo-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mitch Denny <midenn@microsoft.com>
Description
aspire destroycould fail for AKS deployments when the caller did not already have the cluster selected in their ambient kubeconfig. Helm cleanup ran without first acquiring AKS credentials, while Azure resource-group deletion could start concurrently and race the cluster teardown.This change adds a destroy-specific AKS credential step that stays separate from the provisioning-dependent deploy credential step. Kubernetes cleanup steps are tagged per environment so the pipeline can order the main Helm release, opted-in external charts, and cert-manager resources after credential acquisition. Azure resource-group deletion now waits for all cluster cleanup to finish. Credential acquisition uses persisted Azure state so retries after partial teardown continue to target the correct cluster.
User-facing usage
AKS deployments can now be destroyed without relying on the caller's current Kubernetes context:
KUBECONFIG="$(mktemp)" aspire destroy \ --apphost MyApp.AppHost/MyApp.AppHost.csproj \ --environment my-environment \ --non-interactive \ --yesThe regression coverage verifies the complete destroy dependency graph, including multiple AKS environments, and the deployment scenario replaces its ambient kubeconfig before running destroy.
Fixes: #19206
Checklist
<remarks />and<code />elements on your triple slash comments?