Route agent dispatch across subscription harnesses

[markmhendrickson]

Summary

• route Apis work across Claude, Codex, and Cursor using live headroom, cooldowns, and safe failover without silent metered-key fallback
• propagate Claude subscription authentication through daemon launches and add the supporting launchd/runtime configuration
• add the concierge, nucifraga, ops, ploceus, and sitta skills/docs plus task-pairing support

Test plan

• uv run pytest execution/daemons/apis/test_harness_router.py execution/daemons/apis/test_skill_runner.py lib/daemon_runtime/test_claude_auth.py (103 passed)
• Ruff lint and format checks on every changed Python file
• Python compilation, shell syntax, and plist validation
• Full uv run pytest collection needs optional Asana/Pandas/NumPy dependencies and hits existing execution/mcp/ateles package-name collection errors

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Apis — Ateles swarm, swarm dispatcher

⚠️ Pipeline bypass — this PR touches product code but has no parent issue, so it skipped the gated pipeline (issue triage → pm/arch sign-off → Cicada implementation).

The review panel still runs and merge stays operator-gated, so nothing is blocked. To restore traceability, file the issue and add a Closes #N line to this PR description, then re-run the pipeline. Otherwise the gates are being back-filled after the fact rather than earned up front.

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Apis — Ateles swarm, swarm dispatcher

🔁 Auto-fix round 1 of 2: routing the panel's blocking findings back to the review agents for guidance, then to the implementer. A new push re-runs the panel.

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Apis — Ateles swarm, swarm dispatcher

🔁 Auto-fix round 2 of 2: routing the panel's blocking findings back to the review agents for guidance, then to the implementer. A new push re-runs the panel.

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Lanius — Ateles swarm, PR gate inheritance
BLOCKED

• Parent issue identified
• pm gate signed_off/waived
• ux gate signed_off/waived
• arch gate signed_off/waived

Gate status (pre-impl)

Gate	State	Owner
pm	pending (unverifiable)	Pavo
ux	pending (unverifiable)	Accipiter
arch	pending (unverifiable)	Waxwing
impl	n/a	—
pr_review	n/a	—
qa	n/a	—
legal	n/a	—

Owner: none (no parent issue) → next: link parent / clear gates, then Vanellus for pr_review

Labels: none applied on this PR check

Gate inheritance check (synchronize re-check)

No parent issue could be found for this PR:

• PR body contains no closes #N / fixes #N reference.
• GitHub closingIssuesReferences is empty; timeline has no cross-referenced issues linking to PR Route agent dispatch across subscription harnesses #331.
• Keyword search across open/closed issues (harness routing, subscription harness, agent dispatch, harness_router, metered fallback, cooldown/headroom) found no clear match for this PR's scope.

Per the legacy-issue rule, this is NOT a "gates never initialized on a known issue" case — there is no issue entity at all to check, retroactively init, or merge into. Without a parent issue, pre-impl gate status cannot be verified from Neotoma gate_status, so this is treated as blocked.

Unsigned pre-impl gates (no owning issue to check, so all three are unverified):

Gate	Owner
pm	Pavo
ux	Accipiter
arch	Waxwing

Resolution paths

1. Link the parent issue — edit the PR description to include closes #<N> (or fixes #<N>) for the issue this implements, then re-request the gate check.
2. Gate owners sign off — once a parent issue is linked, the owner (Pavo / Accipiter / Waxwing) can set gate_status.<gate> → signed_off on that issue entity in Neotoma, or the operator can waive.
3. Operator override — @markmhendrickson may run /confirm-gates-clear to waive all unsigned pre-impl gates and re-trigger the PR pipeline. No other commenter can clear gates.

---

📎 Neotoma: ateles#331

[github-actions]

Loxia Review 🪶

Verdict: COMMENT

Summary

This PR adds five new agent_definition mirrors (concierge, ops, ploceus, nucifraga, sitta) as paired .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md + docs/agents/*.md files, alongside an MCP version pin fix, a .gitignore entry, and a batch of daemon/infra changes. The visible portions (agent prompts, YAML pin, gitignore) are clean and well-formed; the daemon Python changes were cut off by the 40k truncation and could not be fully inspected.

Findings

• 🔴 Secrets: none detected — agent prompts are generic/role-based, resolve operator specifics from context entities (operator_profile, locale_profile, etc.), and carry no PII. Only entity IDs and <name>@ateles-swarm AAuth subs appear, which are public by policy.
• 🟡 Scope: broad but arguably coherent — five draft/new agent definitions plus infra (MCP pin, .gitignore, and ~10 daemon files: apis.py, harness_router.py, skill_runner.py, claude_auth.py, neotoma_agent.py, plist files, tests). The agent-definition additions and the daemon-runtime changes are two distinct concerns; consider whether they belong in one PR. Not blocking, but worth noting for reviewability.
• 🟡 gitleaks: cannot confirm — lib/daemon_runtime/claude_auth.py and execution/daemons/apis/harness_router.py were truncated from the diff and may reference env-var names (e.g. *_TOKEN, API_KEY). If they introduce new secret-shaped identifiers, verify .gitleaks.toml allowlist coverage. Unverifiable from the visible diff.
• 🟢 Linting: no issues visible — the ateles-tests.yml change is valid YAML with a clear rationale comment; the pin 'mcp>=1.1.0,<2' is correctly quoted.
• 🟢 Pattern: agent-definition files follow the established mirror convention (do-not-edit header, entity frontmatter, canonical docs/agents/*.md ↔ .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md pairing, missing-entity fallbacks, role-resolution via swarm_roster). Daemon startup-pattern conformance (AgentLoader → AAuthSigner → Notifier → loop) could not be verified — the daemon .py bodies were truncated.
• 🟢 Docs: docs/swarm_orchestration.md is included in the change set (good). Note: CLAUDE.md's "Key entity IDs" table does not list the five new agent_definition IDs — that table isn't exhaustive of all agents, so this is optional, but if these agents graduate from DRAFT it may be worth adding the active ones.

Recommendations

No changes required from the visible diff. Two follow-ups for the author/human reviewer to confirm the parts I couldn't see:

1. Confirm the truncated daemon files (claude_auth.py, harness_router.py, skill_runner.py, apis.py) introduce no new secret-shaped env-var names without corresponding .gitleaks.toml allowlist entries, and that any new daemon follows the T3 startup pattern.
2. Consider whether the agent-definition additions and daemon-runtime changes should be split for cleaner review history.

---

Loxia automated review · commit ee7ef47

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Cicada — Ateles swarm, issue worker
COMMENT

• Diagnosed failing required check mcp-server-tests
• Root cause: unpinned uv pip install mcp pulled mcp 2.0 (Tool.inputSchema → input_schema; Server.list_tools removed)
• Fix pushed on feat/harness-routing-and-agent-skills (ee7ef47): pin mcp>=1.1.0,<2 in workflow + requirements; schema assertions tolerate either attr name
• Local verification: unit + smoke suites green under pinned mcp 1.29
• Awaiting CI re-run on this push (do not merge)

Not opening a new PR; not merging (operator-gated).

📎 Neotoma: ateles#331

[ateles-agent]

review:pm
🤖 Pavo — Ateles swarm, pm lens panelist

REQUEST_CHANGES

Reviewing scope/acceptance-criteria fit only. No pre-registered pm-gate artifact exists for this PR — I searched Neotoma (plan_contribution, issue) and GitHub for a linked issue/plan and found none, so this is reviewed against the PR's own stated summary and standing lens criteria, not a signed-off spec.

Note on evidence bar: this review is diff-only (no checkout), so findings below are what's evident from the diff text itself — not runtime claims.

[BLOCKING] scope-creep: two files unrelated to the PR's stated intent, with no import/reference from anything else in the diff

• execution/scripts/config.py (new, 101 lines) — an AsanaConfig dataclass for an Asana source→target workspace migration script. Nothing in this diff imports or calls it; it has no connection to "route Apis work across Claude/Codex/Cursor," "propagate Claude subscription auth," or the five named skills in the PR summary.
• hooks/logic/spawn_task_neotoma_pairing.py (new, 78 lines) + hooks/logic/__init__.py — a PostToolUse hook that reminds the assistant to pair spawn_task UI chips with a durable Neotoma task entity. This is a distinct, user-visible behavior change (new hook firing on every spawn_task call) with its own governance surface (references a hook_policy entity per its own docstring) that the PR description never mentions and that has nothing to do with harness routing or Claude-auth propagation.

Per PM lens criteria ("no unrequested scope creep; user-visible behavior matches the issue"), both are out-of-scope additions riding on an unrelated PR. Since there's no pm-gate sign-off artifact to check against, I can't confirm whether these were separately scoped elsewhere — if they were, link the plan/issue in the PR body; if not, split them into their own PR(s) so each ships against its own acceptance criteria and review lens.

[NON-BLOCKING] scope-ambiguity: launchd plist path migration bundled in silently

• execution/daemons/cyphorhinus/com.ateles.cyphorhinus.plist and execution/daemons/piculet/com.ateles.piculet.plist rewrite ProgramArguments/WorkingDirectory from /Users/markmhendrickson/repos/ateles to /Users/markmhendrickson/ateles-rc-src. This is an operator machine-path/deployment-layout change, not a harness-routing or Claude-auth change. It may be legitimate host-migration housekeeping riding along with the other plist edit in this PR (apis/com.ateles.apis.plist, which is in-scope — it wires the new Claude-auth env), but the PR body doesn't call it out. Unverified without operator context on whether ateles-rc-src is the intended new deploy path; flagging so it's a deliberate inclusion rather than an accidental copy/paste from a working branch.

[NON-BLOCKING] scope-fit: everything else maps cleanly to the stated summary

• harness_router.py, skill_runner.py, apis.py, lib/daemon_runtime/claude_auth.py + tests — matches "route Apis work across Claude, Codex, and Cursor... without silent metered-key fallback" and "propagate Claude subscription authentication through daemon launches."
• cotinga.py, formica.py, morning-brief.py, neotoma_agent.py — each swaps env=os.environ for the new claude_subprocess_env() helper at their Claude-subprocess spawn sites. This is exactly the "propagate ... through daemon launches" line item, correctly threaded through every daemon that spawns Claude, not scope creep.
• .claude/skills/{concierge,nucifraga,ops,ploceus,sitta}/SKILL.md + docs/agents/*.md — matches "add the concierge, nucifraga, ops, ploceus, and sitta skills/docs."
• execution/mcp/ateles/requirements.txt pin (mcp<2) + test_server.py schema-attr shim — disclosed in the PR's second commit message as a CI-breakage fix (unpinned mcp install pulled 2.0 and broke Server.list_tools); legitimate CI-lane fix riding along, not silent.
• .gitignore monedula runtime-state entry — small, plausibly-unrelated one-liner but low enough blast radius not to block on.

Priority/sequencing: no open questions block sequencing on the routing/auth core — that work is coherent and self-contained. The two BLOCKING items should be pulled into their own PRs before merge so this PR's diff matches its own description.

[ateles-agent]

review:arch
🤖 Waxwing — Ateles swarm, arch lens panelist

Reviewed diff-only (no PR checkout executed) — findings scored against that evidence bar.

[NON-BLOCKING] schema-agnostic-design: provider identity is smuggled into tool_name rather than a declared field
skill_runner.py's _write_harness_event calls now pass tool_name=f"{provider}:{skill}" (e.g. "codex:qa") instead of a distinct field. harness_event (schema 689230f4-cd83-49b6-baa7-a752cf70629d) already has a clean, single-purpose tool_name slot that downstream readers (dashboards, list_observations queries, any future harness-cost rollup) currently treat as "which skill ran." Overloading it with a colon-delimited compound value is exactly the kind of ad hoc encoding docs/foundation/schema_agnostic_design_rules.md warns against for entity_type-varying behavior — here it's field-varying behavior smuggled into a string convention instead of a declared field. A provider field on the same entity (optional, defaulting to "claude" for back-compat with existing rows) would let existing tool_name=skill queries keep working unmodified and let provider-based analytics query directly instead of parsing prefixes.
Unverified/what would confirm: I did not run a query against a live harness_event collection to see if any existing consumer parses tool_name as an exact skill name (which the prefix would now break) — if such a consumer exists this becomes a correctness bug, not just a style concern. Recommend confirming before merge; if none exists, this is a one-time schema debt worth paying down before the field format calcifies across your event history.

[NON-BLOCKING] interface-consistency: three new provider adapters, one shared trust boundary — confirm it holds under diff-only review
_provider_command builds argv for claude, codex, and cursor with materially different flag sets (--allowed-tools only applied for claude; MCP config injection only for claude; tool-allowlist enforcement is entirely absent for codex/cursor per the diff at skill_runner.py's tools != ["*"] branch, which is now gated provider == "claude" and ...). That's a legitimate difference in what each CLI supports today, but it means the agent_definition.tools allowlist — a security-relevant, cross-cutting contract — is enforced for one provider and silently not enforced for the other two. This isn't necessarily wrong (Codex/Cursor may lack an equivalent flag), but it's a divergence from "the same interface behaves the same way regardless of which adapter serves it," which is the kind of thing that should be named explicitly (a doc comment or ADR note saying "Codex/Cursor have no allowlist equivalent; risk accepted because policy X") rather than left implicit in a code diff.
Unverified: I cannot execute codex exec --help / cursor-agent --help from a diff-only review to confirm no allowlist-equivalent flag exists. If one does exist, this becomes a real gap: a dispatched agent_definition with a restrictive tool allowlist gets silently un-restricted when routed to Codex/Cursor under quota pressure — recommend confirming and, if no flag exists, filing a tracked follow-up rather than treating the gap as permanent.

[NON-BLOCKING] pattern-conformance: run_skill() kept 100% additive — good, no note needed on callers
Confirmed as a positive, not a finding: run_skill's new provider: str | None = None parameter is keyword-only and defaults to the router's own selection, so all ~10 existing call sites in swarm_dispatch.py (and Formica's mirror, if any) keep working unmodified. This is the right shape for a multi-caller internal interface change — flagging it here only so the "no interface break" claim is explicit and verifiable in this thread, not asserted without a paper trail.

No OpenAPI/contract_mappings/MCP/CLI surface is touched by this PR — harness_router.py and the skill_runner changes are internal subprocess-dispatch mechanics behind Apis, not an HTTP/MCP-exposed capability, so docs/architecture/openapi_contract_flow.md and MCP↔CLI instruction parity are not in scope here. The one schema-adjacent surface (harness_event.tool_name) is addressed above.

Verdict: COMMENT — no blocking architectural defect is evident from the diff itself. The tool_name overload is worth fixing before more history accumulates in that shape, and the allowlist-enforcement asymmetry across providers deserves an explicit, documented decision rather than implicit silence, but neither is a demonstrated invariant violation at diff-review time.

📎 Neotoma: harness_event schema 689230f4-cd83-49b6-baa7-a752cf70629d (see docs/data_types.md)

[ateles-agent]

review:ux
🤖 Accipiter — Ateles swarm, ux lens panelist

COMMENT

Reviewed diff-only (no checkout available this run) against the ux lens: discoverable naming, actionable error messages, docs/examples for the new cross-harness dispatch surface. Scope: execution/daemons/apis/harness_router.py, skill_runner.py, apis.py, lib/daemon_runtime/claude_auth.py, docs/swarm_orchestration.md.

What works well

• run_skill's exhausted-providers error (skill_runner.py) names every attempted provider and the failure kind (capacity/auth/launch) per attempt via the log line, which is the actionable-hint bar this lens looks for.
• apis.py --help env docs are rewritten cleanly for the new surface — each new APIS_HARNESS_* var gets a one-line purpose + default, matching the existing doc style.
• docs/swarm_orchestration.md gets a worked example (harness-headroom.json sample) rather than just a schema description — good for a developer who wants to copy-paste and adjust.
• The plist ships defaults with inline comments explaining the safety boundary (APIS_ALLOW_METERED_HARNESS), so an operator reading the launchd config directly (not just the code) can understand intent without cross-referencing.

Findings

[NON-BLOCKING] error-message-actionability: the "no eligible provider" terminal error doesn't hint at the fix
skill_runner.py run_skill, the no-candidates branch:

msg = (
    "no subscription-backed harness provider has usable headroom "
    f"(configured={configured}; cooling={cooling})"
)

This tells the operator what is wrong (nothing eligible) and why (config + cooldown state), but not what to do — e.g. that APIS_ALLOW_METERED_HARNESS=1 is the escape hatch, or that headroom can be raised via ~/.config/ateles/harness-headroom.json without a restart. Compare to the per-attempt log line a few lines below, which is already good practice (f"[apis] {skill}: {selected} {failure_kind or 'launch'} failure; trying next subscription-backed provider"). Unverified — I can't execute this path — but the gap is evident from the string literal itself: a terminal failure message is where an operator needs the next action most, and this one omits it. Recommend appending something like "(raise headroom, wait for cooldown, or set APIS_ALLOW_METERED_HARNESS=1 to allow metered fallback)".

[NON-BLOCKING] naming-consistency: APIS_HARNESS_PROVIDERS values are lowercase-only, silently drops unrecognized/duplicate entries
harness_router.configured_providers() lowercases and filters against PROVIDERS, silently dropping anything unrecognized or duplicated (test test_operator_order_is_respected_and_deduplicated confirms "cursor,claude,cursor,unknown" → ["cursor", "claude"] with no warning). An operator who typos a provider name (e.g. calude) gets no error and no log line — the provider is just quietly absent from rotation, which is hard to distinguish from "capacity/cooldown held it out." A one-line log.warning on drop would close the gap between "the config didn't do what I typed" and "why is this provider never picked." Unverified against a running daemon — this is a read of the function body, not observed behavior — but the silent-drop is unambiguous in the code as written (harness_router.py, configured_providers).

[NON-BLOCKING] docs-completeness: new DRAFT agent skills (concierge, ops) aren't mentioned in docs/swarm_orchestration.md's scope/index
.claude/skills/concierge/SKILL.md and .claude/skills/ops/SKILL.md are net-new, clearly marked DRAFT/not-yet-active in their own files (good self-labeling), but docs/swarm_orchestration.md — the doc a developer would read to understand "what agents exist and how do they get invoked" — isn't updated to list or reference them alongside the harness-routing section added in this same PR. A developer skimming that doc for the current agent roster won't discover these two exist until they browse .claude/skills/ directly. Low severity since the files self-document DRAFT status, but it's a discoverability gap for the canonical index doc.

Acceptance checklist (ux lens)

• New env vars documented with purpose + default in apis.py --help
• New config surface (harness-headroom.json) has a worked example in docs
• Per-attempt failure logging includes provider + failure kind (actionable)
• Terminal "no provider eligible" error suggests a concrete next action
• Unrecognized/duplicate APIS_HARNESS_PROVIDERS entries are surfaced, not silently dropped
• New DRAFT agent skills cross-referenced from the canonical orchestration doc

No blocking findings — everything above is either a hypothesis about unobserved runtime behavior (correctly downgraded to non-blocking per the diff-only evidence bar) or a minor doc-completeness gap, not a defect evident from the diff structure itself.

📎 PR: #331

[ateles-agent]

review:legal
🤖 Buteo — Ateles swarm, legal lens panelist
APPROVE

Diff-only legal lens (jurisdiction: Spain/EU · GDPR + ePrivacy per locale_profile; Ateles licence MIT per product_profile). No counsel-threshold contract. Risk analysis intended visibility=private in Neotoma.

Compliance checklist

• dependencies/licensing — only dependency delta is mcp>=1.1.0,<2 (pin of existing SDK; PyPI licence MIT) — compatible with Ateles MIT; no new copyleft/CC-NC surface
• secrets/PII surface — no secrets committed; subscription-only child env strips metered API keys by default; Claude Neotoma MCP bearer written to mode-0600 temp file (not argv) then unlinked
• data-handling — no new public-effect customer send path in runnable code; new agent docs (ploceus/nucifraga/concierge) stay planned/draft with Stage-1 checkpoint language for customer-visible actions
• ToS/legal exposure — harness routing + metered-spend hard boundary reduce silent commercial/API spend exposure; no unsubstantiated public claims introduced in customer-facing copy

Findings

[NON-BLOCKING] secrets/credential-hygiene: OPENAI_API_KEY / CURSOR_API_KEY are newly first-class in _METERED_CREDENTIALS / child env policy but are absent from _REDACTED_ENV_VARS in execution/daemons/apis/skill_runner.py. Diff-evident gap: if a child echoes env into diagnostics under APIS_ALLOW_METERED_HARNESS=1, those values would not redact. Confirm by grepping diagnostics writers after a forced metered-path failure; fix by extending the redaction tuple.

[NON-BLOCKING] credential-scope: execution/daemons/anthus/run_anthus_launchd.sh exports the entire materialized ~/.config/neotoma/.env into the daemon process (not an allowlist). Intent (OAuth inheritance) is sound; blast radius for every secret in that file is broader than the Claude OAuth need. Unverified at runtime which keys children inherit after _subscription_only_env. Prefer an allowlist export.

[NON-BLOCKING] data-handling/public-effect: Cursor adapter invokes --force --trust --approve-mcps (skill_runner._provider_command). Diff-evident expanded auto-approval posture; runtime MCP data egress to third parties unverified without executing the harness. Confirm with a Cursor-provider dry-run that only intended MCP servers are reachable.

[NON-BLOCKING] PII/operator-identifying path: com.ateles.cyphorhinus.plist / com.ateles.piculet.plist commit absolute /Users/markmhendrickson/... paths (path rewrite only; pattern pre-existed). Prefer $HOME-relative / templated install paths for public-repo hygiene.

Escalation verdict: sign/merge from legal lens — no [BLOCKING] items; address NON-BLOCKING hygiene in follow-up if desired. Not legal advice.

---

📎 Neotoma: locale_profile ent_ea9a413189860f872c6cc99a · product_profile ent_f79f82c13b90a9d6439623db · strategy ent_31ba41447ab220a3df40d610 · conversation ent_6bf6e8b29a5912c5d535303f

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Vanellus — Ateles swarm, PR steward
REQUEST_CHANGES

Per-lens roll-up

Lens	Verdict	Blocking
pm (Pavo)	REQUEST_CHANGES	2
arch (Waxwing)	COMMENT	0
ux	COMMENT	0
legal (Buteo)	APPROVE	0

[BLOCKING] (2) — must clear before merge

1. [BLOCKING] scope-creep (pm): execution/scripts/config.py — unused Asana migration config; not referenced by harness-routing/auth work; not in PR summary. Split to its own PR or remove.
2. [BLOCKING] scope-creep (pm): hooks/logic/spawn_task_neotoma_pairing.py (+ hooks/logic/__init__.py) — unrelated PostToolUse hook / user-visible behavior; not in PR summary. Split to its own PR or remove.

[NON-BLOCKING] (carry forward)

• pm: unexplained cyphorhinus/piculet plist path rewrite → ateles-rc-src
• arch: harness_event.tool_name overloaded as provider:skill; Codex/Cursor lack --allowed-tools parity
• ux: exhausted-providers error lacks next-step guidance; silent drop of unknown APIS_HARNESS_PROVIDERS entries; DRAFT skills not indexed in docs/swarm_orchestration.md
• legal: metered-key redact gap (OPENAI_API_KEY/CURSOR_API_KEY); Anthus .env export blast radius; Cursor --force --trust --approve-mcps; absolute home paths in plists

Merge recommendation

Do not merge. Route back to Gryllus to strip or split the two out-of-scope files, then re-run panel. Parent issue #unknown — no Neotoma issue entity to advance pr_review; PR-level gate treated as changes_requested. Merge remains operator-gated.

• Blocking scope-creep cleared
• Fresh panel re-review after push
• Parent issue linked (or /confirm-gates-clear)

Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES · Blocking: 2 · Owner: gryllus

---

📎 Neotoma: ateles#331 · task ent_892f7a5d6d8b1236c0235eb1

[ateles-agent]

Aggregated Review Verdict — ateles#331

🤖 Vanellus — Ateles swarm, PR steward
REQUEST_CHANGES

Parent issue: #unknown (not found in PR body / Neotoma). Gate inheritance unverifiable. No merge (operator-gated + blockers).

Per-lens roll-up

Lens	Verdict	Blocking
pm (Pavo)	REQUEST_CHANGES	2
arch (Waxwing)	COMMENT	0
ux	COMMENT	0
legal (Buteo)	APPROVE	0

[BLOCKING]

1. scope-creep — execution/scripts/config.py (unused Asana config; not in stated PR intent)
2. scope-creep — hooks/logic/spawn_task_neotoma_pairing.py (+ __init__.py) — unrelated spawn_task/Neotoma pairing hook

Merge recommendation

Do not merge. Split or drop the two out-of-scope files, then re-dispatch panel / @claude review. Routed to Gryllus (pr_review → changes_requested).

Posted: #331 (comment)

---

🧠 Neotoma — Vanellus aggregate review ateles#331

Updated (1)

• 🔀 ateles#331 Route agent dispatch… — REQUEST_CHANGES / changes_requested (pull_request)

Created (2)

• ✅ Address ateles#331 PM scope-creep blockers before re-review (task)
• 💬 Aggregated REQUEST_CHANGES comment posted (pr_comment)

Retrieved (1)

• 🔀 ateles#331 (prior gate-inheritance blocked state) (pull_request)

[vanellus] merge_decision: REQUEST_CHANGES — 2 PM BLOCKING scope-creep (config.py, spawn_task_neotoma_pairing); routed gryllus; no merge; parent issue unknown

[ateles-agent]

🤖 Apis — Ateles swarm, swarm dispatcher

🔔 Escalated to the operator (auto-fix-exhausted). Further PR events will not re-notify for this same condition.