Repository navigation
kb/literature/README.md still described G10, and now has a real case instead - #3
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…instead
Four claims in this file stopped being true, three of them when G10 was removed
on 2026-09-09 and one when the folder got its first entry:
* *"No entries yet."* There is one -- `lifetime-ns-tritc.md`. The schema and
rules were written first so the first entry would not have to invent them,
and they held: nothing in the template needed changing to file it.
* The live case was `bleach_photons` under **G10**, with a hypothetical
output block showing a `perturbation.photobleaching` margin. That gate is
gone.
* *"`bleach_photons` per dye is the top example"*, cited to 07 Phase 0 as
literature-or-decay-curve. **No gate consumes it now**, and
`docs/07-roadmap.md` no longer names it. Still empty, and no longer a
number anything waits on -- the difference between a gap and a hole.
The live case is now real rather than illustrated, and both blocks are output
from this repository at `c556db0`:
TRITC @ 555 nm 153.0 W/cm^2 -> BLOCKED [FAIL] missing.lifetime
TRITC @ 555 nm 153.0 W/cm^2 -> PASS 10.00 perturbation.saturation
evidence: assumed advances: NO
**And it makes the tier's point better than the version it replaces.** The old
example showed a literature value producing a margin that said *no*, which is
easy to accept. This one produces a margin that says *yes, comfortably* -- and
still cannot advance a verdict. A passing verdict is exactly where a reader is
tempted to treat an assumed value as a measured one.
The photobleaching arithmetic the old block described is kept in 04 §6, and the
replaced paragraph says so rather than dropping it silently.
`lifetime_ns` is the worked example in its place: G20 reads it, five of
seventeen dyes are still missing it, and no instrument here can measure it
directly -- that needs time-resolved detection this setup does not have, which
is what makes it literature rather than a calibration.
Suite: 1221 passed, 11 skipped. Documentation only; no registry or code change.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Four claims in this file stopped being true — three when G10 was removed on 2026-09-09, and one when the folder got its first entry in #2.
lifetime-ns-tritc.mdbleach_photonsunder G10perturbation.photobleachingmarginbleach_photonsper dye is the top example", cited to 07 Phase 0docs/07-roadmap.mdno longer names itThe live case is real now, not illustrated
Both blocks are output from this repository at
c556db0:And it makes the tier's point better than the version it replaces. The old example showed a literature value producing a margin that said no, which is easy to accept. This one produces a margin that says yes, comfortably — and still cannot advance a verdict.
A passing verdict is exactly where a reader is tempted to treat an assumed value as a measured one, so
advances: NObeside10.00is the sharper demonstration.What is kept rather than dropped
The photobleaching arithmetic the old block described lives in 04 §6, which also says why the gate went. The replaced paragraph points there instead of deleting the reasoning silently.
bleach_photonsis still empty across the registry — it is just no longer a number anything waits on, which is the difference between a gap and a hole. The note says that too.lifetime_nstakes its place as the worked example: G20 reads it, five of seventeen dyes are still missing it, and no instrument here can measure it directly — that needs time-resolved detection this setup does not have, which is what makes it literature rather than a calibration.Scope
Documentation only. No registry change, no code change. Suite: 1221 passed, 11 skipped.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code