Clarify inclusion learning and browsing context - #24
Open
isomorphisms wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Experiment scope
The probe shortlists mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1, e5-small-v2, static-retrieval-mrl-en-v1, and snowflake-arctic-embed-xs. The first real benchmark now covers only
mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1; the other shortlisted encoders remain unbenchmarked.The recovery audit did not find a complete authoritative membership artifact for either the 491-row exercise or the 227-row reading/non-reading split. Both complete partitions were assistant-generated, and the saved 227-row output files were not recoverable. They remain excluded. The checked-in ledger contains only exact user assertions that could be tied to exact URLs. Five reading positives occur in the pinned 219-row sanitized fixture, enough for a positive-unlabeled reading probe with three fit and two row-disjoint held-out positives. This unlocks a limited experiment; it does not claim reproduction of either old partition.
First real embedding result — 2026-09-13
GitHub Actions run
34777706264at headf02f0f94bcfab94c243843f6dff98b5da9233c2ccompleted successfully and preserved the input text, real vectors, embedding provenance, full probe JSON, and diagnostic summary as artifactib-mxbai-reading-probe.The run used
mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1revisionb0561d9a97e6b298da39f0ef3e7d3cf153b1b29a,onnx/model_quantized.onnxSHA-256952f996d8cf46c311ee8654a750fa942b71c8b94aabe69d043dbb2bcaff5528e, ONNX Runtime 1.19.2, mean pooling, 384-dimensional float normalized outputs, and the existing URL-onlyurl: <url>grammar with a 256-token budget. No fit/evaluation labels or probe hyperparameters were changed after seeing the held-out rows.The fixed probe retained 16 unique planes, each fitted from the same three authoritative positives plus six provisional-unlabeled rows. Every one of the nine training rows was a support vector in every plane. Pairwise cosine between normalized plane normals ranged from 0.578891 to 0.772758, with median 0.670730, so changing only the provisional-unlabeled sample materially changes the separator.
The learned high-recall proposal threshold was 0.298998456 and produced only three model proposals: exactly the three fit positives. Held-out positive recall was 0/2. The Rezchikov visualization ranked 37/219 with aggregate score -0.016488046 and was above the fitted zero surface in 6/16 planes.
The Decent Oneranked 58/219 with aggregate score -0.041750192 and was above the zero surface in 2/16 planes. Neither passed the untouched proposal threshold.The fit positives were
Problems I Like, Haaretz offers, and the Benn Peifert X post.Problems I Likeand Haaretz had only tiny maximum reported slack (0.000657 and 0.000335). The Benn Peifert URL was the difficult positive: it had nonzero slack in 14/16 planes and maximum reported slack 0.343927. Because the input artifact contains URLs rather than page semantics, an opaque X status URL is particularly weak evidence from which to infer a reading category.This is a useful negative/diagnostic result for the present URL-only three-positive probe, not evidence that the held-out assertions are wrong and not a measurement against either old assistant-generated partition. Unlabeled rows remain unlabeled: slack on a provisional-unlabeled row means tension with that temporary negative role, not a false-positive or false-negative judgment. The fact that every training row is a support vector makes support-vector membership itself non-selective here; bag-to-bag rotation, slack magnitude, held-out ranking, and zero-surface disagreement are more informative diagnostics. The run does not establish that mxbai is generally unsuitable; the supervision and URL-only input are too sparse for that claim.
Verification
python3 -m py_compile experiments/category-hyperplanes/probe.py experiments/category-hyperplanes/build_url_inputs.py experiments/category-hyperplanes/validate_recovered_labels.pypython3 experiments/category-hyperplanes/probe.py --self-testpython3 experiments/category-hyperplanes/validate_recovered_labels.pymxbai-embed-xsmall-v1ONNX embedding and positive-unlabeled probe in GitHub Actions run34777706264