Skip to content

Clarify inclusion learning and browsing context - #24

Open
isomorphisms wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
clarify-inclusion-and-browser-context
Open

Clarify inclusion learning and browsing context#24
isomorphisms wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
clarify-inclusion-and-browser-context

Conversation

@isomorphisms

@isomorphisms isomorphisms commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • correct the SVM terminology and make the baseline explicit: learned affine planes, separate high-recall proposal thresholds, per-example slack variables, support-vector diagnostics, positive-unlabeled evidence, overlapping category decisions, and optional bagged or hierarchical refinements
  • make intentional human organization typed supervision while keeping model proposals, candidate retrieval, and accepted durable membership distinct
  • establish the first two frontends as visual pre-paint and a ChatGPT-like text-only-by-default task workbench
  • specify focus-region prefetch, bounded GitLab/software and arXiv investigations without speculative tab creation, cheap early source-backed summaries, and a scoped provider-neutral browser-to-assistant context bundle
  • add a disposable explicit-hyperplane probe with reproducible embedding/input provenance, held-out isolation, authoritative overrides, explicit (w) and (b), support examples, slack violations, and unique provisional-unlabeled resampling
  • recover only explicit prior user assertions into a provenance ledger, pin them to exact sanitized source rows, and expose a three-fit/two-held-out reading probe without converting old assistant partitions into ground truth

Experiment scope

The probe shortlists mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1, e5-small-v2, static-retrieval-mrl-en-v1, and snowflake-arctic-embed-xs. The first real benchmark now covers only mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1; the other shortlisted encoders remain unbenchmarked.

The recovery audit did not find a complete authoritative membership artifact for either the 491-row exercise or the 227-row reading/non-reading split. Both complete partitions were assistant-generated, and the saved 227-row output files were not recoverable. They remain excluded. The checked-in ledger contains only exact user assertions that could be tied to exact URLs. Five reading positives occur in the pinned 219-row sanitized fixture, enough for a positive-unlabeled reading probe with three fit and two row-disjoint held-out positives. This unlocks a limited experiment; it does not claim reproduction of either old partition.

First real embedding result — 2026-09-13

GitHub Actions run 34777706264 at head f02f0f94bcfab94c243843f6dff98b5da9233c2c completed successfully and preserved the input text, real vectors, embedding provenance, full probe JSON, and diagnostic summary as artifact ib-mxbai-reading-probe.

The run used mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1 revision b0561d9a97e6b298da39f0ef3e7d3cf153b1b29a, onnx/model_quantized.onnx SHA-256 952f996d8cf46c311ee8654a750fa942b71c8b94aabe69d043dbb2bcaff5528e, ONNX Runtime 1.19.2, mean pooling, 384-dimensional float normalized outputs, and the existing URL-only url: <url> grammar with a 256-token budget. No fit/evaluation labels or probe hyperparameters were changed after seeing the held-out rows.

The fixed probe retained 16 unique planes, each fitted from the same three authoritative positives plus six provisional-unlabeled rows. Every one of the nine training rows was a support vector in every plane. Pairwise cosine between normalized plane normals ranged from 0.578891 to 0.772758, with median 0.670730, so changing only the provisional-unlabeled sample materially changes the separator.

The learned high-recall proposal threshold was 0.298998456 and produced only three model proposals: exactly the three fit positives. Held-out positive recall was 0/2. The Rezchikov visualization ranked 37/219 with aggregate score -0.016488046 and was above the fitted zero surface in 6/16 planes. The Decent One ranked 58/219 with aggregate score -0.041750192 and was above the zero surface in 2/16 planes. Neither passed the untouched proposal threshold.

The fit positives were Problems I Like, Haaretz offers, and the Benn Peifert X post. Problems I Like and Haaretz had only tiny maximum reported slack (0.000657 and 0.000335). The Benn Peifert URL was the difficult positive: it had nonzero slack in 14/16 planes and maximum reported slack 0.343927. Because the input artifact contains URLs rather than page semantics, an opaque X status URL is particularly weak evidence from which to infer a reading category.

This is a useful negative/diagnostic result for the present URL-only three-positive probe, not evidence that the held-out assertions are wrong and not a measurement against either old assistant-generated partition. Unlabeled rows remain unlabeled: slack on a provisional-unlabeled row means tension with that temporary negative role, not a false-positive or false-negative judgment. The fact that every training row is a support vector makes support-vector membership itself non-selective here; bag-to-bag rotation, slack magnitude, held-out ranking, and zero-surface disagreement are more informative diagnostics. The run does not establish that mxbai is generally unsuitable; the supervision and URL-only input are too sparse for that claim.

Verification

  • python3 -m py_compile experiments/category-hyperplanes/probe.py experiments/category-hyperplanes/build_url_inputs.py experiments/category-hyperplanes/validate_recovered_labels.py
  • python3 experiments/category-hyperplanes/probe.py --self-test
  • python3 experiments/category-hyperplanes/validate_recovered_labels.py
  • pinned 219-row canonical-input build and count validation
  • end-to-end CLI/report validation with recovered row-disjoint labels and dummy test-only vectors
  • real mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1 ONNX embedding and positive-unlabeled probe in GitHub Actions run 34777706264
  • preserved embedding/probe artifact with checksummed model and tokenizer provenance
  • independent reviews of the SVM semantics, model provenance, and prefetch/frontend consistency

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant