Repository navigation
V-L2-F2: implement the JSON sidecar storage backend (split from #45) #112
Description
Split out of #45 per its acceptance note ("json sidecar storage is either implemented or removed from manifest (separate issue)").
[sidecar].storage advertised sqlite | json but only sqlite has code; #45 stops silently emitting SQLite DDL for a json store and rejects storage="json" with a pointer here. This issue tracks actually implementing a JSON sidecar (append-only JSON document store mirroring the verisimdb_* tables) OR formally dropping json from the manifest schema + validation if a JSON store is not wanted.
Acceptance:
- Decision: implement JSON store vs drop the option from the manifest enum + docs + validate
- If implement: a JSON storage module with the same octad-dimension coverage as the sqlite path;
generate/drift/gchonour it - If drop:
storageenum,SidecarConfigdocs, manifest template, andvalidate/doctormessaging no longer mention json
Activity
feat(codegen): split sidecar DDL by dialect; reject json sidecar (#45) (
feat(codegen): split sidecar DDL by dialect; reject json sidecar (#45) (
feat(codegen): split sidecar DDL by dialect; reject json sidecar (#45) (
feat(codegen): split sidecar DDL by dialect; reject json sidecar (#45) (
feat(manifest): drop unimplemented json sidecar store (V-L2-F2, #112) (…
test(manifest,gc): positive postgres-storage case + realistic gc fixt…
feat(sidecar): JSON-family storage backend — plain / JSON-LD / NDJSON…
hyperpolymath commentedon May 30, 2026
Wrap-up note: the decision behind this resolution (drop
json; the octad data layer is intrinsically relational, so storage is closed tosqlite+postgres) is now recorded as ADR-0011 (docs/decisions/0011-sidecar-storage-is-relational.adoc), with a CHANGELOGRemovedentry and a README correction, in #149. No reopen needed — this issue stays closed/completed (resolved by #144, test coverage in #147).Generated by Claude Code
chore: Claude Code web config + ADR-0011 documenting the V-L2-F2 json…