Skip to content

ci(workflow-linter): install Bun 1.4.2 verified, not via setup-bun - #249

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/new-session-ywdrth-linter-bun
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/new-session-ywdrth-linter-bun

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

The workflow linter installed Bun with oven-sh/setup-bun@v2.2.0 and bun-version: latest, so its runtime was unpinned. SonarCloud also gives a third-party action pinned by tag a "C" Security Rating ("Use full commit SHA hash for this dependency"), even though actions.lock pins its commit. hyperpolymath/network-ambulance#81 copied the step and fails its quality gate on exactly that finding. Per the owner's call, the fix goes in here first and is then ported.

The linter now downloads the Bun 1.4.2 release archive (the estate pin) and checks its sha256, the way Estate Rules installs nickel, just and yq.

Changes

  • workflow-linter.yml: the "Set up Bun" step is replaced by "Install verified Bun 1.4.2": an HTTPS-only curl, then sha256sum --check --strict, unzip, and the directory appended to $GITHUB_PATH. The digest is the same one gv-clade-index's worker CI uses, and I recomputed it from the release archive.
  • actions.lock: the linter's edge to oven-sh/setup-bun@v2.2.0 is removed. The setup-bun@v2.2.0 dependency record stays, because the commented Bun steps in e2e.yml.template say they resolve through it. check-lock-sync.sh notes it as unreferenced, which it calls harmless. The SHA-keyed setup-bun leaf under the standards reusables is untouched.
  • CHANGELOG.adoc: entry under Unreleased / Changed.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass (just test or equivalent): see Testing
  • Code is formatted (just fmt or equivalent): not run, YAML step only
  • Linter is clean (no new warnings or errors)
  • No banned language patterns (no Python, Go, TypeScript or ReScript; JavaScript runs Bun > Deno > pnpm > npm)
  • No unsafe blocks without // SAFETY: comments
  • No banned functions (believe_me, unsafeCoerce, Obj.magic, Admitted, sorry)
  • SPDX license headers present on all new/modified source files (no headers changed)
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included

As Applicable

  • CHANGELOG or release notes updated

Testing

  • I extracted the new step from the workflow and ran it with a scratch RUNNER_TEMP whose path contains a space. The checksum printed OK and the step added bun-linux-x64 to GITHUB_PATH. bun --version there prints 1.4.2, and bun scripts/check-action-pinning.js under it prints "all action refs are pinned".
  • scripts/check-lock-sync.sh .github/workflows passes, with one "unreferenced, harmless" note for the kept record.
  • Standards' validate-actions-lock.sh at 75bd599 passes.
  • tests/workflows/archetype_lock_merge_test.sh and tests/workflows/validate_workflows_test.sh pass.
  • scripts/check-adoc-renders.sh . passes: all 160 tracked .adoc files render clean under asciidoctor 2.0.26.
  • Not run here: the linter job on GitHub's runner. This PR's own CI covers that.

Generated by Claude Code

The linter ran oven-sh/setup-bun@v2.2.0 with bun-version: latest, so its
runtime was unpinned. SonarCloud also rates a third-party action pinned
by tag "C" ("Use full commit SHA hash"), although actions.lock pins its
commit, and that rating fails network-ambulance#81, which copied the
step. The linter now downloads the Bun 1.4.2 release archive and checks
its sha256, as Estate Rules installs nickel, just and yq.

The linter's lock edge to setup-bun goes. The setup-bun@v2.2.0 record
stays: the commented Bun steps in e2e.yml.template resolve through it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y6FD63UrriRBHqmhhEca9t
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 8 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: ca692b7b-923a-471a-9e06-6fc00377cfc5
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4d19ee and 95e1140.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters: 1
  • .github/workflows/actions.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing: 2
  • .github/workflows/workflow-linter.yml
  • CHANGELOG.adoc
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2026 23:05
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-19T23:05:36.174398Z f253649 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath enabled auto-merge (squash) October 19, 2026 23:05
The merge of main (f253649) kept main's changelog entry and dropped this
PR's. This restores it unchanged, on the owner's call.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y6FD63UrriRBHqmhhEca9t
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 6a8bd11 into main Oct 19, 2026
69 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the claude/new-session-ywdrth-linter-bun branch October 19, 2026 23:11
hyperpolymath pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2026
#249 landed on main (6a8bd11). It and this branch each added a Changed
entry at the top of the changelog. Both are kept.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y6FD63UrriRBHqmhhEca9t
hyperpolymath added a commit to hyperpolymath/network-ambulance that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2026
## Why

Workflow Security Linter's "Check SHA-Pinned Actions" step requires an
inline 40-hex SHA on every `uses:` line. This repository pins its
actions with tag refs that `actions.lock` resolves, so the step rejects
every one of them. That keeps the linter red on main whatever else it
finds. This is the second failing step, after the SPDX check that #80
fixes.

## What

- The step now runs `scripts/check-action-pinning.js`, copied unchanged
from rsr-template-repo (ec33724). A ref passes when it is an inline SHA
or when `actions.lock` resolves it.
- The script runs under Bun 1.4.2, the estate pin. A new "Install
verified Bun 1.4.2" step downloads it from the release archive and
checks its sha256, as hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#249 now does in
the template.
- bf2a196 first used the template's `oven-sh/setup-bun@v2.2.0` with
`bun-version: latest`. SonarCloud failed this PR on that tag-pinned
third-party action ("C Security Rating"), and the runtime was unpinned.
9d13eba replaces it, on the owner's call.
  - `actions.lock` is unchanged from main.
- One change from the template: the example in the error message now
labels `actions/checkout@3d3c42e…` as v7.0.1, which is what this
repository's lock records. The template says v6.0.1.

## Tested

- The script passes on this branch's workflows: "all action refs are
pinned".
- It fails on a planted `uses: some-org/unlocked-action@v1`.
- I extracted the Bun step from the workflow and ran it with a scratch
`RUNNER_TEMP` whose path contains a space. The checksum printed `OK` and
`bun --version` prints `1.4.2`.
- standards' `validate-actions-lock.sh` (75bd599) passes on the lock.

## Merge order

The owner's order is #79 → #82 → #80 → #81 → #78. This PR and #80 change
different steps of the same workflow, so they don't conflict. The linter
goes fully green only once both are in. scan and hypatia also need the
estate re-pin to standards `75bd599`.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y6FD63UrriRBHqmhhEca9t

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants