Repository navigation
chore: add default CODEOWNERS - #1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Author
|
@eddietejeda — over to you. This repo has no CODEOWNERS file, so a new PR never auto-requests a human reviewer. Our SOC 2 change-management control is evidenced by a human review on every change, so a repo that requests nobody is a gap in the audit — this PR closes it by handing reviews to You are on it because you opened this repo. Please merge it, or reassign to whoever owns this repo. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Default CODEOWNERS so new PRs auto-request @hotdata-dev/engineers for review.
If this repo does not need CODEOWNERS — closing this PR only defers it, since the next run opens another. To opt out for good, add
datafusion-jevtoEXCLUDE_REPOSinscripts/sync_codeowners.py.