Resolved-conjecture timeline: the illustration predates the Bondy–Murty corpus
and later literature-status corrections; the site's /timeline/ page currently
shows 130 dated solved or disproved entries. Editable SVG:
scraper/static/resolved-conjectures-timeline.svg.
A browseable, status-annotated mirror of the graph-theory category of
openproblemgarden.org,
extended with new conjectures mined from recent arXiv papers by 12 curated
graph-theorists. Every problem and conjecture is classified as open,
partial, solved, disproved, or unclear via an automated literature-
review pass, with every cited paper verified by WebFetch before inclusion —
and connected by a relation graph of AI-reviewed implications,
equivalences, and duplicates, browsable interactively on the site
(details).
The site also imports literature-status corrections from already_resolved
results and full-problem ALREADY_KNOWN referee verdicts in
Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs.
They appear as solved or disproved according to the result, with a reference
to the existing article credited for the resolution and a separate link to the
automated audit. No model-generated proof is promoted to solved. Refresh the
data from sibling checkouts with python scripts/sync_llm_proof_results.py.
The same import exposes only PDF write-ups that are listed in that repository's
README and received a CONFIRMED referee verdict. Results marked MINOR_GAPS
are excluded. These model-generated results use the separate ai-proved or
ai-disproved labels and link the corresponding PDF. If the literature already
settles the problem, the ordinary literature status takes precedence while the
AI artifact remains available on the detail page.
The same two labels record claims from OpenAI's October 2026 collection of
model-generated manuscripts (github.com/openai/math,
722 manuscripts in 372 result families). Matches against the catalogue are made
by hand, after reading each manuscript's TeX source, and listed in
scripts/sync_openai_math_results.py. An
entry moves to ai-proved or ai-disproved only when a manuscript settles its
exact statement, either directly or through a short argument recorded on the page.
Partial progress is linked without changing the status. See
OpenAI's manuscript collection.
The site also displays a separate ill-posed diagnostic on 23 arXiv records
flagged by the automated attacks in
Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs.
These unrefereed model self-reports do not overwrite the literature-review
status; each affected detail page links to the complete attack artifact and
includes its reason and caveat.
Four corpora, one merged index:
| corpus | count | scope |
|---|---|---|
| OPG | 227 | full graph-theory tag of openproblemgarden.org |
| arXiv | 768 | new conjectures from 857 arxiv papers (2016–2026) by 12 curated authors |
| Bondy–Murty | 38 | items of Appendix A (100 "unsolved problems") of Bondy & Murty's Graph Theory that the two corpora above did not cover (cross-check) |
| others | 1 | conjectures studied in a problems/ workstream but absent from OPG and the arXiv extraction (currently Meyniel's cop-number conjecture) |
Reviewed status counts:
| status | OPG | arXiv | Bondy–Murty | meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| open | 51 | 514 | 12 | no significant progress found in literature search |
| partial | 127 | 118 | 21 | progress since posting |
| ai-proved | 6 | 10 | 0 | model-generated proof (confirmed write-up or OpenAI manuscript) |
| ai-disproved | 6 | 12 | 1 | model-generated counterexample/disproof (same sources) |
| solved | 23 | 83 | 3 | fully proved in the literature |
| disproved | 13 | 22 | 1 | counterexample in the literature |
| unclear | 1 | 3 | 0 | insufficient information to decide |
One OPG problem (OPG_tournament_feedback_arc_set_ptas, ptas_for_feedback_arc_set_in_tournaments) counts as
solved although it was already solved before it was posted on OPG
(Kenyon-Mathieu–Schudy, STOC 2007). Its review has
solved_before_posting: true, and its page says so.
The most recent status changes come from OpenAI's manuscript collection
(October 2026). Thirteen entries moved to ai-proved or ai-disproved, among
them Hadwiger's conjecture (counterexample), Barnette's and Seymour's
second-neighbourhood conjectures, Sidorenko's and Ryser's conjectures
(counterexamples), and the Harary–Hill and Zarankiewicz crossing-number formulas.
See Recently claimed.
Before that, the cycle double cover conjecture
(OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover, /op/cycle_double_cover_conjecture/) moved partial → solved in September
2026 after the July 2026 OpenAI proof and Sang-il Oum's exposition
(arXiv:2607.16356); see
Recently resolved.
44 of the arXiv-extracted records were also identified as direct progress
on existing OPG problems and attached as citations on those OPG pages (e.g. on
OPG_caccetta_haggkvist_outdegree_short_cycle (/op/caccetta_haggkvist_conjecture/) and 20 other pages).
The output site is inspired by erdosproblems.com, which itself is an excellent companion source.
Every record of the four corpora carries a canonical short name of the form
PREFIX_english_name, where PREFIX is OPG, AX, BM or OTH and
english_name is a few lowercase words conveying the statement (e.g.
OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover, AX_cop_number_sublinear_treedepth,
BM_hypohamiltonian_min_degree_4, OTH_meyniel_cop_number_sqrt_n). The 1034
names are distinct; slight variants of one statement share a leading stem and
differ by a trailing qualifier. The old identifiers (OPG slug, arXiv review id,
bm_id, others id) are unchanged and remain the keys for data files and
sibling repositories. Site pages are addressed by the canonical name
(/bm/BM_cubic_second_hamilton_cycle_polynomial/); the old address (/bm/bm-021/)
redirects there; the result files data/llm_proof_results.json and
data/openai_math_results.json are keyed by them and also carry the name.
The correspondence old id → new name is in
CONJECTURE_NAMES.md and, machine-readable, in
data/conjecture_names.json.
The corpus also carries a verified relation graph,
data/relations.json: 225 adversarially verified
relations between conjectures across the corpora — 159 implications
("if A is true then B is true"), 8 equivalences, 16 cross-corpus duplicates,
and 42 documented non-implication links. Each edge records its verified
direction, a checkable referee argument, and citations where the confirmation
is literature-based. It was produced by a multi-agent find-and-refute
pipeline (17 finder agents, then 59 refute-by-default verifiers; 17 of 207
candidates were refuted, including two false fuzzy matches and a
conjecture-name collision); 190 edges survived, and 4 duplicate pairs the
phase-B dedup had missed were merged in September 2026. An incremental pass
then connected the Bondy–Murty and others corpora, adding 39 edges (34
confirmed, 5 plausible) out of 42 candidates, plus one follow-up edge
(orientable 5-CDC ⇒ 5-flow). "Verified" means
checked by adversarial AI referees, not formally verified — no argument
has been machine-checked in a proof assistant such as Rocq or Lean.
Confronting each edge with the review statuses of its two endpoints is now
done at build time and shown on the site: 42 implications are vacuous
(target already a theorem, or source already disproved — 10 of them because
the cycle double cover conjecture was proved), 4 implications are to
verify (a solved source or a disproved target would settle the other
endpoint, but the implication is only AI-checked, so it must be formally
verified or peer reviewed before that status can change), and 1 duplicate
edge is inconsistent (its endpoints have different statuses). See
RELATIONS.md for the design, findings, and caveats;
pipeline provenance lives in data/relations_work/.
On 6 October 2026 OpenAI released
github.com/openai/math: 722 manuscripts in
372 result families, produced by an unreleased internal model and not peer
reviewed. OpenAI's Lean scope pages (lean/docs/<family>.md) name the manuscripts
whose main result is formalized. The formalization catalogue as a whole is marked
review: unchecked, and this project has not run its Comparator checks.
On 7 October 2026 every family in Combinatorics and Theoretical computer science,
plus the graph-related families from other sections, was compared with all 1034
catalogue entries (commit adc7f12). Each match was checked against the
manuscript's TeX source. Status changes:
| page | before | after | OpenAI manuscript | Lean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BM_hadwiger_minor_chromatic (bm-041) Hadwiger's conjecture |
open | ai-disproved | A counterexample to Hadwiger's conjecture: |
no |
OPG_seagull_independence_2_clique_minor_half_n (seagull_problem) |
partial | ai-disproved | same graphs: no clique minor on |
no |
AX_kt_minor_free_independence_n_over_t (1907.12999__00) ( |
open | ai-disproved | same graphs, with |
no |
OPG_hadwiger_list_kt_minor_free_choosable (list_hadwiger_conjecture) |
partial | ai-proved | A linear list-coloring bound in terms of the Hadwiger number | yes |
OPG_sidorenko_bipartite_homomorphism_density (sidorenkos_conjecture) |
partial | ai-disproved | A counterexample to Sidorenko's conjecture (35 vertices, 66 edges) | yes |
AX_directed_sidorenko_bipartite_homomorphism (2210.16971__00), AX_directed_sidorenko_forcing_cycle_homomorphism (2210.16971__01) (directed Sidorenko and forcing) |
open | ai-disproved | same graph, through Theorems 1.5 and 1.8 of the source paper | Sidorenko part only |
OPG_ryser_r_partite_hypergraph_cover_matching (rysers_conjecture) |
partial | ai-disproved | two papers: intersecting |
yes |
AX_r_partite_hypergraph_matching_drop_deletion (2505.05339__02) (deletion form implying Ryser) |
open | ai-disproved | same hypergraphs | yes |
OPG_crossing_number_complete_graph_harary_hill (the_crossing_number_of_the_complete_graph) |
partial | ai-proved | The crossing number of complete graphs (Harary–Hill) | yes |
OPG_crossing_number_complete_bipartite_zarankiewicz (the_crossing_number_of_the_complete_bipartite_graph) |
partial | ai-proved | The crossing number of complete bipartite graphs (Zarankiewicz) | yes |
OPG_seymour_second_neighborhood_outdegree (seymours_second_neighbourhood_conjecture) |
partial | ai-proved | A proof of Seymour's second-neighborhood conjecture | yes |
OPG_barnette_cubic_planar_bipartite_hamiltonian (barnettes_conjecture) |
partial | ai-proved | Paired states and Hamiltonian cycles in cubic bipartite planar graphs | yes |
Nine further entries link a manuscript as partial progress, with their status unchanged:
-
BM_hadwiger_nelson_plane_unit_distance_chromatic(bm-054): the chromatic number of the plane is 6 or 7. -
OPG_caccetta_haggkvist_outdegree_short_cycle(caccetta_haggkvist_conjecture): the second-neighbourhood proof gives a cycle of length at most 3 when both minimum degrees are at least$n/3$ , and the girth-four case of Behzad–Chartrand–Wall. Both are listed as open on the page. The case$r=n/3$ , which bounds only the outdegree, stays open. -
OPG_hadwiger_fractional_chromatic_minor(fractional_hadwiger): part (a) fails; parts (b) and (c) are not addressed. -
AX_kt_minor_free_list_chromatic_2t(2110.09403__00),AX_kst_minor_free_choosable_2s_t(2201.09115__01): linear list-colouring bounds, but the constants$2t$ and$2s+t$ remain open. -
AX_kt_minor_free_hypergraph_chromatic_bound(2206.13635__00):$h(t)=O(t)$ for hypergraphs. -
OPG_eulerian_cycle_decomposition_hajos_n_half(decomposing_an_eulerian_graph_into_cycles):$O(n)$ cycles; Hajós's bound remains open. -
AX_crossing_number_kn_minus_matching(2009.03418__00): only the$t=0$ case. -
AX_ordered_removal_lemma_binary_matrices_polynomial(1704.02367__01): polynomial removal is ruled out; exponential dependence is open.
Some entries are not settled despite overlapping topics. BM_gyarfas_triangle_free_infinite_chromatic_induced_trees (bm-050)
(Gyárfás–Sumner for triangle-free graphs) is a different statement from the
Gyárfás tree-cover conjecture that family 162 disproves. BM_hajos_k5_k6_subdivision_chromatic (bm-042) (Hajós for
The first three changes rest on the Hadwiger counterexample. That manuscript is
outside OpenAI's Lean formalization of family 157, which covers only the
list-colouring bound. The forcing corollary used for AX_directed_sidorenko_forcing_cycle_homomorphism (2210.16971__01) is likewise
outside the Lean scope of family 161. The ai-* labels keep these claims apart
from the literature so they can be revisited once expositions or referee reports
appear, as happened for the cycle double cover conjecture below.
On 11 July 2026 OpenAI announced a proof, produced by GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, that
every bridgeless graph has a cycle double cover, settling the conjecture of
Seymour and Szekeres. Sang-il Oum's exposition,
arXiv:2607.16356, presents it in a
self-contained ten pages assuming only Fleischner's splitting lemma and the
Nash-Williams–Tutte tree-packing theorem: reduce to cubic 3-edge-connected
graphs, take a nowhere-zero
What this repository changed as a result (September 2026):
| page | before | after |
|---|---|---|
OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover (cycle_double_cover_conjecture) |
partial | solved |
OPG_2_connected_circular_surface_embedding (the_circular_embedding_conjecture) |
partial | partial — but the cubic case is now settled |
OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover_5_cycles (m_n_cycle_covers) |
partial | partial — the (8,2) box of the chart is now a theorem |
OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover_strong_5 (strong_5_cycle_double_cover_conjecture), OPG_faithful_cycle_cover_even_weights (faithful_cycle_covers), OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover_prescribed_2_factor (cycle_double_covers_containing_predefined_2_regular_subgraphs), OPG_eulerian_cycle_decomposition_compatible_transition_system (decomposing_eulerian_graphs), OPG_petersen_coloring_bridgeless_cubic (petersen_coloring_conjecture) |
partial/open | unchanged; their implication into CDC is now flagged vacuous |
OPG_berge_fulkerson_cubic_6_perfect_matchings (the_berge_fulkerson_conjecture) |
partial | unchanged; the related_only reading is confirmed — CDC transfers nothing to it |
Explicitly not settled by the proof, and still open on the site: the 5-cycle
double cover conjecture (Celmins, Preissmann — the (5,2) case of
OPG_bridgeless_cycle_double_cover_5_cycles (m_n_cycle_covers)), the orientable 5-CDC conjecture (Archdeacon, Jaeger), which
would imply the 5-flow conjecture, the oriented cycle double cover conjecture,
Bondy's
The proof has not been peer-reviewed or journal-published, and CDC has a history
of flawed arXiv proofs; the solved status is recorded with that caveat spelled
out in the reviewer notes on the page.
# 1) install deps (uv recommended)
uv venv
uv pip install -r scraper/requirements.txt
# 2) the data is already in data/; render the static site
.venv/bin/python scraper/build.py --confirmed-only
python -m http.server --directory site 8000
# open http://localhost:8000data/arxiv_authors.json lists the 12 authors whose recent (since 2016) work
on math.CO, cs.DM, and math.GT is mined for new conjectures:
Paul Seymour · Sophie Spirkl · Stéphan Thomassé · Pierre Aboulker
Alex Scott · Zdeněk Dvořák · Jacob Fox · Noga Alon
Gwenaël Joret · Raphael Mario Steiner · Bojan Mohar · Marthe Bonamy
Edit that file to grow or shrink the curated set; the rest of the pipeline re-runs idempotently.
.venv/bin/python scraper/crawl.py # polite OPG crawler, 12s/req
.venv/bin/python scraper/parse.py # HTML → data/problems.json
.venv/bin/python scraper/erdos_index.py # erdosproblems.com index
.venv/bin/python scraper/intersect.py # OPG ↔ erdosproblems cross-ref
# Literature review (8-terminal worker pattern):
.venv/bin/python scripts/partition.py --workers 8
# In 8 terminals: PER_SLUG_TIMEOUT=900 WORKER=NN bash scripts/run_worker.sh# (1) Metadata harvest via OAI-PMH — fast, polite, ~7 min for the 3 sets
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_oai_fetch.py --set math.CO,cs.DM,math.GT --from 2016-01-01
# (2) Download paper content (HTML, PDF fallback) — ~2h for 857 unique papers
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_download_content.py
# (3) Partition + 8-worker extraction via `claude -p` — ~2h on Max plan
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_partition.py --workers 8
# In 8 terminals: PER_PAPER_TIMEOUT=900 WORKER=NN bash scripts/arxiv_run_worker.sh
# (4) Aggregate: dedup states + fuzzy-match studies → OPG
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_aggregate.py
# (review data/arxiv_opg_matches.tsv, set manual_confirmed flags as desired)
# (5) Phase 1 internal cross-reference (free, no claude calls, ~1s)
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_internal_refs.py
# (6) Phase 2 web-search status review — ~5h on Max plan
.venv/bin/python scripts/arxiv_review_partition.py --workers 8
# In 8 terminals: PER_REVIEW_TIMEOUT=900 WORKER=NN bash scripts/arxiv_review_run_worker.shAppendix A of Bondy & Murty's Graph Theory (GTM 244, 2008; French edition
by F. Havet, 2025, HAL) lists 100
open problems. BONDY_MURTY_APPENDIX_A.md
cross-checks every item against the OPG and arXiv corpora: 60 were already
present, 6 only weakly covered, 32 missing, 2 out of scope. The 38 uncovered
items form the third corpus.
# (1) Regenerate the records (hand-transcribed statements live in the script)
.venv/bin/python scripts/bm_build_records.py # → data/bondy_murty_conjectures.json
# (2) Status review via `claude -p` with web search, same schema as the arXiv reviews
PER_REVIEW_TIMEOUT=900 .venv/bin/python scraper/bm_review.py --all --jobs 6
# # → data/bondy_murty_reviews/<bm_id>.jsonEach record keeps the appendix number, the book section and page, the
English statement, the attribution, and related pointers to the nearest
OPG / arXiv / erdosproblems.com records. Pages render under /bm/<bm_id>/.
Other workstream conjectures. data/others_conjectures.json holds
hand-written records with the same shape (plus a workstream path) for
conjectures that a problems/ workstream studies but that neither OPG nor the
arXiv extraction contains. The same driver reviews them:
.venv/bin/python scraper/bm_review.py --records data/others_conjectures.json \
--out-dir data/others_reviews --system-prompt scraper/others_review_system_prompt.md --allPages render under /others/<id>/ with a link back to the workstream.
The hand-checked matches live in MATCHES in
scripts/sync_openai_math_results.py. The script resolves each listed
manuscript against a checkout of the OpenAI repository, adding the PDF link
pinned to the checked commit and the Lean flag from lean/docs/<family>.md:
git clone https://github.com/openai/math ../openai-math
.venv/bin/python scripts/sync_openai_math_results.py --source-dir ../openai-math
# # → data/openai_math_results.json.venv/bin/python scraper/build.py --confirmed-only--confirmed-only attaches only arxiv_opg_matches.json entries flagged
manual_confirmed: true. Without the flag, auto-high (score ≥ 92) matches
are also attached.
OPG branch:
crawl.py → cache/op/<slug>.html polite crawl, 12s/req
parse.py → data/problems.json 227 OPG problems
erdos_index.py → data/erdos_graph.json 277 erdosproblems records
intersect.py → data/intersection.json fuzzy OPG ↔ erdos matches (only `confirmed: true` rows used)
review run → data/reviews/<slug>.json 227 status reviews
arXiv branch:
arxiv_oai_fetch.py → cache/arxiv/<slug>/papers.json 12 author manifests
arxiv_download_content → cache/arxiv/<slug>/*.html|*.pdf 857 unique papers
arxiv_run_worker.sh → data/arxiv_extracted/*.json 1,565 raw records
arxiv_aggregate.py → data/arxiv_conjectures.json 768 deduped conjectures
→ data/arxiv_opg_matches.{json,tsv} 44 confirmed citations
arxiv_internal_refs.py → data/arxiv_internal_refs.json 148 cross-corpus refs
arxiv_review_* → data/arxiv_reviews/<id>.json 762 status reviews
Bondy–Murty branch:
bm_build_records.py → data/bondy_murty_conjectures.json 38 appendix items not covered above
bm_review.py → data/bondy_murty_reviews/<id>.json 38 status reviews
Others branch:
data/others_conjectures.json hand-written workstream conjectures
bm_review.py --records … → data/others_reviews/<id>.json status reviews
AI results:
sync_llm_proof_results.py → data/llm_proof_results.json Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs import
sync_openai_math_results.py → data/openai_math_results.json OpenAI manuscript matches
Site:
build.py → site/ Jinja2 → static HTML, KaTeX
/ merged index (995 rows, filter by source/status)
/op/<slug>/ 227 OPG problem pages
/arxiv/<id>/ 768 arxiv conjecture pages
/bm/<bm_id>/ 38 Bondy–Murty appendix pages
/others/<id>/ other workstream conjecture pages
/author/<slug>/ 218 author landing pages
/tag/<slug>/ 227 subject pages
/relations/ interactive relation-graph drawing
(from data/relations.json via
scraper/relations_layout.py; problem
pages get a "Related conjectures" box)
Both review runs use a terminal-per-bucket worker pattern (scripts/*_run_worker.sh)
rather than in-process parallelism. Each terminal runs claude -p sequentially
for its bucket, with an os.killpg-based hard timeout per item to recover from
infrastructure stalls. See LIT_REVIEW.md for the design rationale.
graph-conjectures/
├── scraper/ # Python pipeline + Jinja2 templates + CSS
│ ├── crawl.py / parse.py # OPG crawler + parser
│ ├── erdos_index.py / intersect.py # OPG ↔ erdosproblems cross-reference
│ ├── arxiv_fetch.py # legacy /api/query author search (kept for reference)
│ ├── arxiv_extract.py # claude -p extraction of one paper
│ ├── arxiv_review.py # claude -p status review of one conjecture
│ ├── bm_review.py # claude -p status review of Bondy–Murty items
│ ├── arxiv_system_prompt.md # extraction prompt
│ ├── arxiv_review_system_prompt.md # review prompt
│ ├── bm_review_system_prompt.md # Bondy–Murty review prompt
│ ├── others_review_system_prompt.md # "others"-record review prompt
│ ├── review_system_prompt.md # OPG-review prompt
│ ├── build.py # site generator
│ ├── templates/ # Jinja2 templates
│ ├── static/style.css
│ └── requirements.txt
├── scripts/ # worker-pattern harness
│ ├── partition.py / run_worker.sh # OPG-review workers
│ ├── arxiv_oai_fetch.py # OAI-PMH metadata harvest
│ ├── arxiv_download_content.py # polite HTML/PDF download
│ ├── arxiv_partition.py # extraction-bucket partition
│ ├── arxiv_run_worker.sh # extraction worker
│ ├── arxiv_aggregate.py # dedup + OPG-match aggregator
│ ├── arxiv_internal_refs.py # intra-corpus cross-reference
│ ├── arxiv_review_partition.py # review-bucket partition
│ ├── arxiv_review_run_worker.sh # review worker
│ ├── bm_build_records.py # Bondy–Murty Appendix A records → JSON
│ ├── sync_llm_proof_results.py # Graph-Theory-LLM-Proofs import
│ ├── sync_openai_math_results.py # hand-checked OpenAI manuscript matches → JSON
│ ├── conjecture_names.py # id → canonical name, added to the result files above
│ ├── arxiv_fetch_all.py # legacy /api/query driver (kept for reference)
│ ├── arxiv_disambig.py # legacy disambiguation gate
│ ├── status.sh # snapshot all OPG workers
│ └── timeout_claude.py # process-group SIGKILL wrapper for `claude -p`
├── data/
│ ├── problems.json # 227 OPG problems
│ ├── reviews/ # 227 per-slug OPG review JSONs
│ ├── erdos_graph.json # erdosproblems.com index, 277 problems
│ ├── intersection.json # fuzzy OPG↔erdos matches; `confirmed` flag per row
│ ├── arxiv_authors.json # the 12 curated arxiv authors
│ ├── arxiv_conjectures.json # 768 deduped new conjectures
│ ├── conjecture_names.json # canonical PREFIX_english_name per conjecture (old id → name)
│ ├── arxiv_extracted/ # 857 raw per-paper extraction outputs
│ ├── arxiv_reviews/ # 762 per-conjecture review JSONs
│ ├── arxiv_opg_matches.{json,tsv} # arxiv → OPG citation matches (manually triaged)
│ ├── arxiv_internal_refs.{json,tsv} # intra-corpus cross-refs (Phase 1)
│ ├── bondy_murty_conjectures.json # 38 Bondy–Murty Appendix A items not covered elsewhere
│ ├── bondy_murty_reviews/ # 38 per-item status reviews
│ ├── others_conjectures.json # hand-written workstream conjectures (Meyniel, …)
│ ├── others_reviews/ # their status reviews
│ ├── llm_proof_results.json # imported literature corrections and AI write-ups
│ ├── openai_math_results.json # 22 entries matched to OpenAI manuscripts
│ ├── relations.json # 225 verified conjecture-to-conjecture relations
│ ├── relations_work/ # relation-pipeline provenance (tags, candidates, verdicts)
│ ├── categories.json
│ └── authors.json
├── problems/ # self-contained research workstreams
│ ├── directed_path_minimum_outdegree/
│ ├── earth_moon_problem/
│ ├── 3_decomposition_conjecture/
│ ├── pebbling_cartesian_product/
│ ├── unit_vector_flows/
│ └── meyniels_conjecture/
├── PLAN.md # OPG crawler / parser / site design
├── LIT_REVIEW.md # OPG literature-review design
├── RELATIONS.md # conjecture relation graph: pipeline + findings
├── LICENSE # MIT for code
└── LICENSE-DATA.md # GFDL for data derived from OPG
A separate workstream attacks Thomassé's directed-path conjecture
(every oriented graph with minimum out-degree
The workstream now lives under
problems/directed_path_minimum_outdegree/.
Its current packaged status closes
- Code: MIT (see
LICENSE). - Data derived from openproblemgarden.org: GFDL v1.2 with attribution
(see
LICENSE-DATA.md). Each problem record carries acanonical_urlfield linking back upstream. - Data derived from arxiv.org: arXiv allows bulk metadata access via
OAI-PMH and free distribution under terms documented at
info.arxiv.org/help/api/tou.html.
Each conjecture record carries the source
arxiv_idandabs_url.
- The Open Problem Garden community for their decade+ of curating these problems.
- Thomas Bloom for erdosproblems.com, which directly inspired the layout and which we cross-reference.
- The 12 curated arXiv authors whose recent work is mined here.
- Reviews and extraction were generated with Claude (Sonnet 4.6) via
claude -p, with every cited URL verified byWebFetchbefore inclusion. Reviews are advisory and should be spot-checked before being relied upon for research decisions.
