docs(eval): summary-skill evaluation strategy deck#1644
Open
romrak wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Presentation outlining how to evaluate the dashboard-summary skill: quality via the /summary endpoint in gd-eval (rubric-based LLM judge), integration via a Playwright smoke test of the chat skill. Covers the dataset structure and what is reused vs. to be implemented. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1644 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 79.10% 79.10%
=======================================
Files 231 231
Lines 15718 15718
=======================================
Hits 12433 12433
Misses 3285 3285 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds
packages/gooddata-eval/docs/summary-eval.md— a presentation deck outlining the proposed strategy for evaluating the GoodData dashboard-summary skill.Why
Summaries are free-text and non-deterministic, so a single golden answer doesn't work. The deck proposes splitting the problem into two concerns, each tested with the right tool:
/summaryendpoint ingd-eval, using a rubric-based LLM judge (must-include facts, must-not-include guards, soft quality criteria). Gradedquality_scoretames non-determinism and reuses existinggd-evalscoring.userContextand runs AFM forresultIds, so we avoid reimplementing that plumbing in Python.The deck also covers the dataset structure and what is reused out-of-the-box vs. what must be implemented.
Note
Open prerequisite flagged in the deck: confirm whether the chat skill and the
/summaryendpoint share the same summarizer — this determines whether endpoint quality-eval fully covers the chat skill.Type
Docs only — no code changes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code