C++: Fix global variable dataflow FP#20040
Merged
jketema merged 4 commits intogithub:mainfrom Jul 14, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…' in the 'IRfunction' for 'v' itself.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes a false positive in global variable dataflow analysis for C++ code. The issue occurs in an edge case where a global variable is used within its own initialization expression, causing incorrect dataflow through SSA definitions.
- Adds a test case demonstrating the problematic scenario with self-referential global variable initialization
- Modifies the SSA internals to exclude
InitialGlobalValuenodes fromIRFunctions that initialize the same global variable - Updates expected test results to reflect the new test case
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| test.cpp | Adds test case for self-referential global variable initialization |
| dataflow-consistency.expected | Updates expected test results for the new test case |
| SsaInternals.qll | Implements fix by filtering out problematic SSA definitions |
30 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a very odd corner case of global dataflow through global variables.
Consider this snippet (which I've also added as a test):
int recursion = (sink(recursion), source());The IR we generate for this snippet is roughly equivalent to:
where
__recursionrepresents the actual global variable. Since this is anIRFunctionjust like any otherFunction, it gets an initial SSA definition of the global variables that it reads, and it gets a final SSA use of the global variables that it defines. So for the point-of-view of dataflow the function ends up looking like:where
__initialize_globalrepresents the initial SSA definition (aInitialGlobalValuenode), and__final_use(recursion)represents the final SSA use (aFinalGlobalValuenode).And now global variable dataflow does its things and this happens:
recursionat// (1)flows to the final SSA use at// (2)// (2)to the global dataflow node (aGlobalLikeVariableNode) forrecursionrecursionto the initial SSA definition forrecursionat// (3)// (3)to the use at// (4).But clearly we should not have flow in this case! So this PR fixes the FP by removing the
InitialGlobalValuenode for some global variablevat the entry for theIRFunctionthat initializesv.I don't think this will ever happen on any real codebase. But since it was so easy to fix we might as well get this fix in 😄