Repository navigation
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SUGGESTION: Rationale references a file that does not exist in this repo, and the exclusion is broader than needed
The PR description justifies this by
tests/js/screen.test.jscallingnew Function(...), but the only tracked file undertests/istests/test_routes.py; there is notests/js/directory and noscreen.test.jsanywhere in the tree. Either the motivating finding came from a different branch/repo state, or the trigger no longer exists.Also note that a top-level
exclude_pathsremoves the wholetests/tree from every Codacy engine (linters included), which is wider than the single eval/Function()failure described. Narrowing to the specific engine/rule, or keeping the top-level entry with a comment explaining why all oftests/is excluded, would keep test coverage for unrelated rules.Not blocking - the config itself is valid and matches Codacy's schema.
Reply with
@kilocode-bot fix itto have Kilo Code address this issue.