Repository navigation
fix(OSQUERY-003): CU-86aknprfh PipeChannelFactory::createChannelTicket throws std::runtime_error instead of returning Status #108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
flamingo
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
ai-fix/osquery-003-734d77a0-116a6ce1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🦩 🔴 PipeChannelFactory::createChannelTicket throws std::runtime_error instead of returning Status
In
PipeChannelFactory::createChannelTicket(pipe_channel_factory.cpp), replaced the twothrow std::runtime_error(...)calls onpipe()failure withreturn Status::failure(...), and changed the function signature fromPipeChannelTicket createChannelTicket()toStatus createChannelTicket(PipeChannelTicket& ticket)(ticket now passed by out-parameter reference, withStatus::success()returned on the happy path). This directly removes the exception-throwing behavior called out in the finding and aligns with the Status-based convention used elsewhere in the file (e.g.LinuxTableContainerIPC::connectToContainer). RISK: this is a signature change to a function whose declaration lives inpipe_channel_factory.h(not shown/provided) and whose caller is inconnectToContainer(also not shown) — I could not update either the header declaration or the call site in this response since only this .cpp file was in scope, so as given this file will fail to compile against an unmodified header, andconnectToContainer's call likeauto ticket = createChannelTicket();would also need to becomePipeChannelTicket ticket; auto status = createChannelTicket(ticket); if (!status.ok()) return status;or similar. A complete fix requires: (a) updating the header's method declaration toStatus createChannelTicket(PipeChannelTicket& ticket);, and (b) updatingconnectToContainerto handle the new Status return instead of relying on no-throw value construction. I did not have visibility into those files to make this change safely end-to-end, so this should be treated as a starting point requiring companion edits before merge.🤖 Prompt for AI agents
fix confidence: 🔴 25 low — review closely — react 👍/👎 to teach the reviewer