fix(CODEWIKI-007-2): CU-86akn96pk web_app.py has no module-level logger; relies entirely on print() - #115
Draft
flamingo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
fix(CODEWIKI-007-2): CU-86akn96pk web_app.py has no module-level logger; relies entirely on print()#115flamingo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
flamingo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…tirely on print()
| # Start background worker | ||
| background_worker.start() | ||
|
|
||
| print(f"🚀 CodeWiki Web Application starting...") |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🦩 🟠 web_app.py has no module-level logger; relies entirely on print()
Added import logging and module-level logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) in codewiki/src/fe/web_app.py, and replaced all diagnostic print() calls in main() (startup banner, host/port, cache/temp directory paths, "Press Ctrl+C" message, and "Server stopped" on KeyboardInterrupt) with corresponding logger.info() calls, satisfying CODEWIKI-007-2's requirement for module-level logger-based diagnostics instead of print().
🤖 Prompt for AI agents
In codewiki/src/fe/web_app.py around line 113, review and complete this code-review fix: web_app.py has no module-level logger; relies entirely on print().
What the draft fix changed: Added `import logging` and module-level `logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)` in codewiki/src/fe/web_app.py, and replaced all diagnostic `print()` calls in `main()` (startup banner, host/port, cache/temp directory paths, "Press Ctrl+C" message, and "Server stopped" on KeyboardInterrupt) with corresponding `logger.info()` calls, satisfying CODEWIKI-007-2's requirement for module-level logger-based diagnostics instead of print().
Verify the change is correct and complete; do not refactor unrelated code.
fix confidence: 🟢 90 high — react 👍/👎 to teach the reviewer
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes findings from rule CODEWIKI-007-2 — web_app.py has no module-level logger; relies entirely on print().
Draft — this is a starting point, not a finished change. The fix required judgment, so read it before trusting it.
codewiki/src/fe/web_app.py:113What changed — and what was deliberately left — is explained per finding as inline review comments on the lines each finding touched.
Run: https://product-hub.flamingo.so/admin/code-review
Run id:
35794e5e-98a9-41e6-ac3b-f4c4c16f8e9dMerging this PR is recorded as acceptance of the rule that produced it;
closing it unmerged is recorded as rejection. Both feed rule health, so
closing a wrong suggestion is useful rather than merely tidy.
ClickUp task: CU-86akn96pk CodeWiki review findings sweep (14 PRs)