test: prove durable authority, effect accounting, and cleanup residuals - #69
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 26, 2026
szmyty
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 26, 2026 15:42
Pull Request Summary by devActivityMetricsAchievements
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Flow's durable lifecycle suite covered interruption and recovery but lacked observable effect counts and cleanup-residual qualification. This PR supplies the remaining synthetic proof for #31.
Runtime APIs and schemas are unchanged. All effects are harmless local witnesses. Upload uses network permission; paid-service requests use AI-provider permission. The explicitly acknowledged retry demonstrates a second uncertain effect—there is no exactly-once, sandbox, automatic cleanup, or real external-action claim.
Validation:
Evidence: immutable acceptance reconciliation and local validation record. The record pins the tested code commit, source identities, report/receipt digests, and remaining limits; the follow-up commit only retains documentation and evidence.
Closes #66.
Closes #31.
#13/#11 remain open for real-provider integration and later gates. After maintainer merge, the agreed next checkpoint is Optiflow #88. No automatic merge.