-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 571
[tests] Fix CA1416 root cause in test projects instead of suppressing it #11761
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
simonrozsival
wants to merge
3
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
simonrozsival:android-suppress-ca1416-in-tests
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions
7
tests/Mono.Android-Tests/Mono.Android-Tests/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you set the SupportedOSPlatformVersion MSBuild property instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SupportedOSPlatformVersionis actually already set on this project (<SupportedOSPlatformVersion>$(AndroidMinimumDotNetApiLevel)</SupportedOSPlatformVersion>, currently24) — but it doesn't produce the attribute here.The .NET SDK only turns
SupportedOSPlatformVersioninto[assembly: SupportedOSPlatform]inside theGenerateAssemblyInfotarget, which is gated onGenerateAssemblyInfo == true(Microsoft.NET.GenerateAssemblyInfo.targets). These test projects set<GenerateAssemblyInfo>false</GenerateAssemblyInfo>to avoid clashing with the hand-writtenProperties/AssemblyInfo.cs, so the property is inert and no attribute is emitted. The Android SDK consumesSupportedOSPlatformVersiononly for typemap/runtime generation, not for the assembly attribute.So to drive it from the property we'd have to either:
GenerateAssemblyInfo=falseand move everything inProperties/AssemblyInfo.cs(including[assembly: UsesPermission]inTestRunner.Core) into MSBuild, or$(SupportedOSPlatformVersion)viaWriteCodeFragment.Do you prefer one of those over the explicit
[assembly: SupportedOSPlatform]? Happy to wire up (2) if you'd like to keep it property-driven.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, yeah we can remove
GenerateAssemblyInfo=false, I remember this problem.We'd have to migrate attributes to the relevant MSBuild properties -- or you get duplicates.
The MSBuild properties seem better, in general.