fix: align OpenBell proof claims - #24
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e10272b00f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review P1 evidence gap addressed at exact head 2c88be6. The branch now publishes the exact settled-pilot rejection commitment preimage, verifies its canonical artifact hash against the lifecycle rejectedArtifactHash, verifies the raw provider-response hash and REJECT decision, enforces source/public byte parity, scans forbidden public fields, and links the evidence from the challenged architecture claim and proof room. Local release validation: FOUNDRY_OFFLINE=true npm run check passed. Review exact commit: 2c88be6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2c88be6ff9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Second P1 fail-closed gap addressed at exact head d2c1f72. The evidence test now scans the decoded provider envelope with both forbidden-key traversal and the shared public credential/value scanner, plus a negative embedded-signature assertion. Full FOUNDRY_OFFLINE=true npm run check passed. Review exact commit: d2c1f72 |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
1 participant
Summary
Verification
FOUNDRY_OFFLINE=true npm run checkClaim boundaries
This change does not claim legal invoice validity, production demand, independent wallet ownership, a model approval in the settled pilot, or independent completion of the full lifecycle.