Skip to content

Add explain diagnostic tests#631

Open
PatersonProjects wants to merge 2 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
PatersonProjects:explain_tests
Open

Add explain diagnostic tests#631
PatersonProjects wants to merge 2 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
PatersonProjects:explain_tests

Conversation

@PatersonProjects

@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds the tests for the explain diagnostic command. Explain is an interesting case, as it has both more internal complexity and crosses more features than many of the other diagnostic commands. It also requires a collection as part of its own function call. Because of this, explain tests primarily rely on CommandTestCase rather than DiagnosticTestCase in order to take advantage of runtime collection resolution.

Ref: Issue #43, #438

…and duplicates, edited docStrings

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2026 21:14
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects marked this pull request as draft June 19, 2026 21:16
@documentdb-triage-tool documentdb-triage-tool Bot added the compatibility test Compatibility test related label Jun 19, 2026
@documentdb-triage-tool

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Auto-triaged by documentdb-triage-tool.

Applied: compatibility test, enhancement
Project fields suggested: Component test-coverage · Priority P2 · Effort L · Status In Progress
Confidence: 0.85 (mixed)

Reasoning

component from path globs (test-coverage); effort from diff stats (1061+0 LOC, 8 files); LLM: Adds new test coverage for the explain diagnostic command using CommandTestCase, touching the compatibility tests component within a single area.

If a label is wrong, remove it manually and ping @patty-chow so the rules can be tuned. The bot will not re-label items that already have component labels.

@documentdb-triage-tool documentdb-triage-tool Bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 19, 2026
…case return

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2026 22:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compatibility test Compatibility test related enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant