-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
fix(varlock): finish the response when leak detection throws on end #1065
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c143a33
fix(varlock): finish the response when leak detection throws on end
WalksWithASwagger 3539727
Kill the connection on an end() leak instead of substituting an error…
theoephraim 1698c0e
Assert how a request failed, so the no-hang scenario cannot pass on a…
theoephraim 42a91b2
Give an expected-failure request a single attempt
theoephraim 8e503ea
Restore the replacement 500 when the headers have not gone out
theoephraim 5704807
Reset the reason phrase on the replacement 500
theoephraim 196d52d
Trim the leak prevention note and fix nits in the secrets guide
theoephraim File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| varlock: patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| A leak detected in `ServerResponse.end` no longer leaves the HTTP client hanging. The response is finished before the leak error is rethrown (a plaintext 500 if the headers have not gone out yet, otherwise the connection is closed), so a Next.js Pages Router `res.json()` that would have leaked a sensitive value fails the request instead of stalling the client on a body that never arrives. |
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions
12
framework-tests/frameworks/nextjs/files/pages-router/leaky-api-route.ts
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| import type { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next'; | ||
|
|
||
| import { ENV } from 'varlock/env'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Deliberately leak a sensitive value from a pages-router API route. `res.json()` | ||
| // writes the whole body through a single `ServerResponse.end()` call, so the leak is | ||
| // caught there rather than in `write()`. Varlock has to finish the response itself | ||
| // (the client would otherwise hang), and next's `apiResolver` catch path then calls | ||
| // `res.end()` a second time - which must not take the dev server down. | ||
| export default function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) { | ||
| res.status(200).json({ leaked: ENV.SENSITIVE_VAR }); | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This now says every detected leak makes the request fail, but integrations using
redactInsteadOfThrowcomplete the request with a redacted body, as the new development-mode Next.js scenario demonstrates. Please scope the failure behavior to throw mode or mention the redaction outcome so this guide remains accurate in development.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
its mostly internal, used during development only - so probably ok