Repository navigation
docs(interactive): Phase 2 first-pass V0.3/V0.6-R5 conformance matrix - #16
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Evidence-led first-pass audit, not a final conformance sign-off.
3a0adc3edb41869a6309bae29ec5496df00970c815f8dc16330a90cbf26e703e) and Technical Design V0.6-R5 (114,621 bytes; SHA-25609f3a5698e238d10b80efb8e26d1c41e51b663ca620efa70815dd7b52f2106ba).First-pass findings requiring code-and-contract review
CF-01 / P1 P0-A: Confirmed Technical Design §4, §16 and approved A-M5-02 require
adminTerminateand a separately trusted admin tombstone controller. No such method appears in currentsrc/interactive/index.mjs, coordinator factory result ortypes/interactive.d.ts. Do not count M5/S12-A as fully PASS.CF-02 / P1 candidate: Confirmed Requirements §7.1 and Technical Design §4 specify importable
start/complete/resume; current./interactiveexports factory APIs instead. Need check whether a later, user-approved contract change exists before proposing a correction. Do not silently revise the official sources.CF-03 / N-BLOCKED: Scripted Host tests and earlier live-Grok file exchange do not demonstrate native Grok JS tool-loop provenance or true Windows security isolation.
CF-04: Action/Human/Loop/Parallel belong to future approved stages; do not flag their absence as a P0-A defect.
CF-05 / P1 candidate: Confirmed V0.6 §4/§5 says model/public SDK frames cannot contain complete State and trusted terminal result needs separate auth. Current coordinator
asPublicFrame()embeds{state:cp.state}in terminal frames; this is a contract/potential misdisclosure risk, not evidence that the model has actually seen private State. Host-onlygetPublicAgentTask()remains guarded.CF-06 / P1 candidate: Confirmed V0.6 §5/§8 defines an asynchronous five-operation
CheckpointStoreV1; currenttypes/interactive.d.tsand Coordinator require synchronouscreateRun/putArtifact/getArtifact/load/compareAndSwap, directly consume return values, and therefore do not accept an asynchronous compliant Host store. This matters for future host-selected remote persistence. Check whether an explicitly approved contract change exists before any Core adaptation.Safety and merge gates
Docs only. No production Core, Program ABI, Store schema, public API, frozen requirements or technical design changes. This PR must remain Draft until exact-HEAD CI and independent review verify source traceability and initial findings; even a green CI does not close Phase 2 formal conformance or M6/C12/S13. Do not release, deploy or start a production code fix from this audit.
R2 focused source re-review — 2026-11-12
9ae5efa16f8c71527a1ca4084c1c7819bd9434f5.ae5fc5aand current main13d573c; the audit baseline is updated in R2, not rewritten in R1.coordinator.startsnapshots caller-ownedstateandstartIntentafter awaiting Program load, contrary to the R04 first-await snapshot invariant; source-based inference, failing regression not yet executed.snapshotOptions.featureStagethen after awaits passes liveoptions.featureStageto lowering; can cause input-mutation-dependent false rejection, not a proven P0-B bypass.Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only PR that records audit findings and review gates; it does not alter runtime behavior, APIs, or schemas.
Overview
This PR adds two docs-only audit artifacts—no production Core, types, tests, or schema changes—and explicitly states the work is a partial evidence pass, not a conformance PASS.
R1 introduces a baseline matrix against hash-verified Requirements V0.3 and Technical Design V0.6-R5: indexed T01–T34, R01–R22, and S01–S14 with code/test entry points, honest P-PARTIAL / DEFERRED / BLOCKED statuses, and priority findings CF-01–CF-06 (e.g. missing
adminTerminate, SDK export shape vs contract, terminalstateon public frames, sync vs async Store).R2 rebaselines on current main, confirms five critical source blobs unchanged since R1, refines CF-02 (factory exposes
start/complete/resume; dispute is top-level export shape), and adds CF-07 (coordinator.startsnapshotsstate/startIntentafter the firstawait) and CF-08 (compileInteractivemay use liveoptions.featureStageafter awaits). It links PR #17 as intended-failing R04 snapshot tests and records next review gates without authorizing merge or Core fixes.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 90cc0de. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.