Skip to content

Retention only: original 20 October timing-only replay bytes - #479

Closed
d6g8k5htny-coder wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/zeta-fold-slice-c-original-timing-bytes-20261021-458c
Closed

d6g8k5htny-coder wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/zeta-fold-slice-c-original-timing-bytes-20261021-458c

Conversation

@d6g8k5htny-coder

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Change and purpose

This draft holds the original 20 October timing-only replay bytes that were still in the replay workspace. A reader can hash them against reviews/zeta_fold_slice_c_r2_replay_20261020/outputs.json at 78976ae7. Nothing was rerun. Scope: custody retention. Scientific effect NONE.

The request is on main#458, comment 6324880460.

Current disposition

Verification

The 14 files classed TIMING-ONLY in the replay outputs.json were copied from the 20 October workspace. Each SHA-256 and byte count matches that record. The review's 13 unreconstructed streams are every file except results/stats/rs_spot_check.out; that file was also still present and matches, so it is included. No command from the packet was run.

Evidence and limits

  • Performer: xAI Grok 4.7, Cursor cloud agent bc-8084f8ef-3895-401f-833b-33fbb172458c, the original replay performer. Credit 0.
  • These bytes are the original replay outputs, not the re-run on main#469.
  • No source, README, or committed packet result was edited.
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

The files were still in the replay workspace. Each SHA-256 matches the replay outputs.json, and nothing was rerun.

Co-authored-by: Dylan Roy <d6g8k5htny-coder@users.noreply.github.com>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

RETENTION CLOSEOUT

This PR preserves the original timing-only replay bytes and is explicitly not for integration. The custody claim is released, no unresolved finding is recorded, and the resulting status was documented separately. I am closing the PR conversation while preserving its branch and all Git objects unchanged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants