[d6g8k5htny-coder]

Engineering/source-custody repair only. Scientific effect NONE.

PR #166 merged with the reviewed mathematical manuscripts unchanged, but the landed packet verifier still permitted a coordinated manuscript+MANIFEST refresh (or manuscript removal+MANIFEST refresh) while REVIEW_RECORD stayed untouched. That defect was independently reproduced in the integration lane before merge.

This successor fixes the landed packet without changing either mathematical manuscript, SOURCES.json, geometry.py, RESULTS.json, any graph/status/claim, or any review verdict:

• adds ACCEPTED_BINDINGS.json binding the exact accepted mathematical head, both manuscript byte/SHA256/blob identities, and the actual scoped A/B/C review IDs;
• makes verify.py enforce those accepted manuscript identities independently of MANIFEST and require the exact review-id mapping;
• requires essential accepted/replay leaves to remain in the packet inventory;
• adds real regressions showing that a coordinated manuscript+manifest rebinding, review-id rewrite, or manuscript removal is rejected;
• regenerates MANIFEST for the repair;
• adds a scoped push: main path trigger so future landed packet changes re-run this custody workflow.

Accepted mathematics remains exactly:

• TWO_SCALE_LAW.md blob a32fd5f7d941bbe1fe943df045b1e0fbec8d691c
• RADIAL_TAIL.md blob 0f14417ef7038b9c6f50e4b01e393a58b7b5e3a4

Bound reviews remain A 5360227991, B 5360178611, C 5360216551. One Claude provider/session, zero organizational-independence claim.

This does not authenticate GitHub review objects over the network, prove the mathematics, or prevent an intentionally reviewed future change to the verifier contract itself; it closes the demonstrated packet-self-rebinding hole and makes such a change explicit/reviewable rather than silently satisfiable by regenerating MANIFEST.

Please review the verifier contract and regression cases only; do not reopen the mathematical proofs.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-30T01:57:48.380042Z	7504ba0	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[d6g8k5htny-coder]

@codex review — bounded engineering/source-custody review only. Please reproduce the three new negative cases (coordinated manuscript+manifest refresh, review-id rewrite, manuscript removal), verify ACCEPTED_BINDINGS is independent of MANIFEST authority for the two reviewed manuscripts, and check the scoped main-push trigger. Do not review or reinterpret the mathematical manuscripts; their blobs must remain a32fd5f7 and 0f14417e.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: 7504ba081b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[d6g8k5htny-coder]

Source-preserving current-main refresh complete: head bf00963 merges only current main fa1cf7b into reviewed repair head 7504ba0. The five PR-delta blobs are unchanged, so Codex comment5902558878 still binds the exact engineering repair bytes it reviewed. Fresh current-head CI is running; merge remains held until both packet and downstream aggregates succeed and the thread/head/main readback stays clean.

[d6g8k5htny-coder]

Coordination update: PR #172 landed concurrently from the earlier C25 integration owner and implements the same custody repair more completely (frozen machine-readable REVIEW_RECORD.json, exact proof+SOURCES bindings, required-payload membership, nine binding regressions, and main-push replay). I independently fetched the three live native #166 reviews and verified #172's recorded body identities exactly: A5360227991 = 7840 B / c63efc292d7cf209e2770419cc159276897d0ba955c32ee1d2af88c8aa7f0ed8; B5360178611 = 7631 B / 3042d958b769b0a9ada1359b6f8d9461c090060fe5057cff795c99b6c6c2894d; C5360216551 = 4277 B / 9a2c89c6e0c122fc75cc96a2b6392b47ab33bc47feb072b9f2a56315c527df84. I am closing this duplicate rather than fragmenting the repair. No scientific or review status changes from this branch; #172 is the integration target.