docs: standardize Homebrew on the two-step install#34
Merged
Conversation
…l crewhaus` Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per maintainer preference, standardize the Homebrew install on the two-step
brew tap crewhaus/tap && brew install crewhausinstead of the qualified one-linerbrew install crewhaus/tap/crewhaus.Both install the exact same formula from the same tap. The two-step is preferred because its second command is the bare
brew install crewhausthat will survive once the formula reaches homebrew-core, and the qualified one-liner reads as redundant.🤖 Generated with Claude Code