docs: add COTI ERC-7984 as a top-level product section - #32
Closed
plucena-coti wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
plucena-coti wants to merge 3 commits into
plucena-coti wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
…er guide Documents how COTI's Privacy on Demand pERC20 compares with FHE-based confidential-token implementations of ERC-7984, covering 256-bit vs 64-bit numeric range, ~192-byte encrypted inputs vs multi-KB ZK proofs, exact encrypted allowances vs time-boxed operators, non-revealing failure, and the session-scoped garbled-circuit security model. Includes the six pTokens live on Avalanche Fuji and Ethereum Sepolia. Adds the page to SUMMARY.md navigation and cross-links it from PrivateERC20.sol.
gmesika-coti
requested changes
Aug 23, 2026
gmesika-coti
left a comment
gmesika-coti
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as disscussed in daily. plz see fireflies video
Moves the PoD pERC20 vs ERC-7984 page out of the Privacy Portal developer guide and republishes it as its own product section in the main hierarchy, split into seven sub-pages. - New section: COTI ERC-7984, listed after Privacy on Avalanche in SUMMARY.md - Sub-pages: precision and decimals, host-chain deployment, transaction economics, transfer semantics, security model, concurrency, deployed contracts - README carries the overview, a nav list, and the summary table - privateerc20.sol.md cross-link repointed at the new product Content is the same prose as before; no claims changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
plucena-coti
changed the title
Removes coti-erc7984/security-model.md along with its SUMMARY entry, the README nav item, and the "No master key" row from the summary table. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded by #33, which lands the same material as a new top-level COTI ERC-7984 product section in one clean commit against Closing this in favour of that one. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds COTI ERC-7984 as a new top-level product section, comparing COTI's Privacy on Demand
pERC20with FHE-based implementations of the ERC-7984 confidential-token standard.An earlier revision of this PR placed the material as a single page inside the Privacy Portal developer guide. It now stands on its own in the main hierarchy, split into a landing page and six sub-pages.
Structure
Listed after Privacy on Avalanche in
SUMMARY.md, so the PoD / PoA pair stays together.What the section covers
approve/transferFrom, and over-balance transfers that resolve to an encrypted zero with no revert or observable differenceConfidentialTransferevents and ERC-7984 metadataNavigation
coti-privacy-portal/developer-guide/privateERC20-ERC7984.mddeleted; its entry removed from the Privacy Portal developer guideprivateerc20.sol.mdrepointed at the new productNote for reviewers
Prose is unchanged from the previously reviewed page — this revision is a restructure, not a rewrite. No claims, figures, or addresses were altered.
The security-model section of the original page (garbled circuits with non-colluding parties, and the "No master key" row of the summary table) has been dropped from this PR.