Fix build_track failure with Lavalink v4 decodetrack format#66
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Okay haha. Guess pre-commit.ci disagrees with Python Black format. 🤷♂️ |
Contributor
|
NiceAesth
reviewed
Mar 11, 2024
Owner
|
LGTM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Lavalink v4 made some changes to the format returned by
decodetrack. This update resolves those issues by adding a check for Lavalink v4 and using the new format appropriately in thebuild_trackfunction which currently fails with aKeyError.