Skip to content

docs: update documentation references - #135

Open
ranjeet150 wants to merge 1 commit into
clevercon-protocol:mainfrom
ranjeet150:fix/issue-131
Open

ranjeet150 wants to merge 1 commit into
clevercon-protocol:mainfrom
ranjeet150:fix/issue-131

Conversation

@ranjeet150

@ranjeet150 ranjeet150 commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

docs: update documentation references

Closes #131

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the README with a documentation reference. This change is limited to written project information and does not alter app features or behavior. No changes to user-facing functionality are included in this update.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ranjeet150 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Josh's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 609ad7f8-49f2-4e07-a10d-9b912ef1841a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ca52ee and c80ee88.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README adds an HTML comment after the license reference.

Changes

README update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add README comment
README.md
An HTML comment is added after the license reference.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: bosun-josh121

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to c80ee

The README’s visible privacy statements are already consistent. The added comment does not create a merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check ⚠️ Warning The PR summary identifies only an HTML comment, Updated documentation reference, added after the license reference. The comment does not clarify the current private-policy behavior or the roadmap di… Remove the unrelated HTML comment, or replace it with a documentation change that directly supports issue [#131].
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the README documentation reference update. It is concise and specific enough for the changeset.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Issue [#131] requires consistent documentation. The reviewed README already separates current v1 privacy from the roadmap: it states that the policy and policy-to-release link are private today, ident…
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Full details: Out of Scope Changes check

Explanation

The PR summary identifies only an HTML comment, Updated documentation reference, added after the license reference. The comment does not clarify the current private-policy behavior or the roadmap distinction in issue [#131]. It has no demonstrated connection to the linked issue.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.

Warning

⚠️ This pull request has been flagged as potential spam (contributor-gaming) by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

README says private spending policies stay private today, Roadmap says the same feature is not built yet

1 participant