Skip to content

feat: dedicated sequencer base rate 0 - #31

Open
sadiq1971 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sync-operator-base-rate-zero
Open

feat: dedicated sequencer base rate 0#31
sadiq1971 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sync-operator-base-rate-zero

Conversation

@sadiq1971

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes ChainSafe/canton-extending-mainnet#38

Summary: The sync operator app grants its synchronizer's mediator unlimited traffic, and the sync operator suites move to their own CI job where the splitwell synchronizer runs traffic control with a zero base rate, so every other test job keeps the topology it always had.

…r [ci]

Signed-off-by: sadiq1971 <sadiqurr8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: sadiq1971 <sadiqurr8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: sadiq1971 <sadiqurr8@gmail.com>
… [ci]

Signed-off-by: sadiq1971 <sadiqurr8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: sadiq1971 <sadiqurr8@gmail.com>
@sadiq1971
sadiq1971 marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2026 13:21
@sadiq1971 sadiq1971 self-assigned this Sep 4, 2026

@salindne salindne left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, both this PR and PR29 touch

SyncOperatorTrafficIntegrationTest.scala

Looking into it, I think 31 should land first and then i will update 29 so the test still calls sv1ScanBackend.lookupSynchronizerRegistration and still asserts maxBaseTrafficAmount == 0

@salindne
salindne self-requested a review September 4, 2026 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[P2-E5.4] Dedicated sequencer base rate = 0

2 participants