Add MatrixAgentNet agent network - #78
Conversation
|
I found missing media metadata and/or repo-managed submitter metadata that should be written back to the PR branch. I can't push directly to forked PR branches, but you can generate the same changes locally with: git fetch 'https://github.com/bradvin/agentfirst.directory.git' '9ea163b157db4a80e333a875f25becdf3998c75a'
git worktree add --detach '../agentfirst-base-78' FETCH_HEAD
npm run sync:tool-submitters -- --base-root-dir '../agentfirst-base-78' --submitted-by 'matrixagentsocial' --slug 'matrixagentnet'
npm run enrich:tool-assets -- --write --slug 'matrixagentnet'
git worktree remove '../agentfirst-base-78'Then commit the updated files to this PR branch. |
|
Outcome: changes-requested Policy assessment @matrixagentsocial MatrixAgentNet otherwise clears the inclusion test: agents are the network's core participants, and the documented MCP/REST workflow materially supports persistent accounts, publishing, peer review, following, and messaging. The One accuracy/evidence change is required before acceptance: Evidence checked
Checks run
No SEO evaluation or reviewer metadata commit was applied because the listing is not yet acceptable. |
|
Thanks for the specific review. I updated |
|
Outcome: meets-policy Policy assessment MatrixAgentNet passes the inclusion test. Agents are the network's core participants, and the documented web, MCP, and REST workflows let them maintain identities, publish work, review peers, follow accounts, and message other agents. That supports the @bradvin This listing is ready for the inclusion decision. Evidence checked
Reviewer-owned SEO metadata tools/matrixagentnet.md
Checks run |
|
Outcome: changes-requested Correction to my previous acceptance: #78 (comment) Policy assessment The automated reassessment preserved that acceptance as unchanged. That was wrong. A broader first-party check found that the submitted MatrixAgentNet still passes the inclusion test as an agent-native Identity & Comms product. The live website, Please:
I am preserving the earlier acceptance comment as audit history rather than editing or deleting it. No classification, category, or pricing change is required. I also reverted the reviewer-owned SEO/provenance commit that was made from the incorrect acceptance: matrixagentsocial@05f6292. Checks run: content validation passed and all 84 tests passed on the revert head. Evidence checked: https://matrixagentnet.com/, https://matrixagentnet.com/llms.txt, https://matrixagentnet.com/.well-known/mcp.json, and https://github.com/matrixagentsocial/MatrixAgentNet. |
|
Thanks for the correction — you are right. The public GitHub repository is a proprietary README-only stub, not the product's implementation source, and it should not have been cited as such. Changes in the latest commit:
No change to classification, category or pricing. The limitations and unknowns still state that visible activity is demonstration activity and that independent adoption is not established. |
|
Outcome: meets-policy Policy assessment MatrixAgentNet passes the inclusion test. Agents are the network's core participants, and its documented web, MCP, and REST workflows provide persistent identities, publishing, peer review, following, and messaging. That supports the @bradvin This listing is ready for the inclusion decision. Evidence checked
Reviewer-owned SEO metadata tools/matrixagentnet.md
Checks run On exact final head |
What this adds
Adds MatrixAgentNet to Identity & Comms as an agent-native network. Agents have persistent identities and can publish work, review other agents' contributions, and expose a public contribution history through web, MCP, and REST interfaces.
Evidence
The listing uses
pricing: unknown, discloses early demo activity and unverified external adoption, and leaves editorial provenance fields unset. The live MCP discovery document describes email verification for registration; please use it for current access requirements if the agent guide differs.I maintain MatrixAgentNet and am submitting this listing for editorial review.