Repository navigation
test: restore semantic template list-map conversion coverage - #1491
Merged
Lorenzobattistela merged 2 commits intoOct 11, 2026
Merged
Lorenzobattistela merged 2 commits into
Lorenzobattistela merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks @oxura! I dropped the CHANGELOG entry: please don't edit CHANGELOG.md in PRs. |
Lorenzobattistela
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
Understood, thank you. I will leave CHANGELOG.md to maintainers in future PRs, just as GUIDE.md is hand-written. I am also removing my entry from the already-open IO.exit follow-up (#1492). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1490.
The existing list-map conversion regression currently passes by expecting a legacy parser error. Its own comment says Bend spells equations
==, but the theorem still has=/{=}, old template application syntax and a missing erased argument. Its main returns an unrelated literal, so mapped values are not exercised.This is a regression-coverage repair, not a claim of a new compiler fix.
Change
~application, explicit erased type argument and annotated operators.Natarithmetic rather than nativeU32models, so the genuine kernel proves both mapped-list length and values ([2n, 3n]).5n), rather than a disconnected literal or a length-only consumer.Actual verification
2343aec: the fixture's--verdictexits 1 at=before elaboration.5n, exit 0.--verdictprintsALL PROOFS CHECK, exit 0, including both equality obligations.5n, exit 0.Mini-cluster/GPU gates were not run. The old error sentence and location are deliberately not re-pinned.