Guard canonical docs against retired positioning terminology drift#1765
Draft
codeforester wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
docs/contracts.md.workspace control planeproduct phrase.local operating contractthesis and outcome loop in the appropriate introduction surfaces.tests/contracts/run.shso future positioning drift fails with a named file and term.Issue
Fixes #1761
Validation
tests/contracts/run.shgit diff --checkDemo Impact
None. This is documentation policy and CI test coverage only.
Notes
This draft targets
documentation/1760-20260725-core-doc-metadataas the preceding train branch. Retarget it tomainafter #1757 and #1760 are merged. Internal implementation terminology, license text, and historical assessment references remain intentionally outside the guard.