Skip to content

docs(tizen): record the rc2 device evidence and executed CI - #2

Merged
balcsida merged 1 commit into
feat/tizen-6-tvfrom
docs/tizen-rc2-evidence
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

balcsida merged 1 commit into
feat/tizen-6-tvfrom
docs/tizen-rc2-evidence

Conversation

@balcsida

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Documentation only. Brings two stale claims back in line with what has actually happened, and records the first CI-built signed install.

BUILD.md

Its Evidence and limits block had fallen behind ACCEPTANCE.md. It still said the corrected production-identity package was not installed and that playback acceptance was open, while ACCEPTANCE.md has recorded confirmed playback under the real identity for some time. It also said CI had never run and no release was published; there are now several green runs and three releases.

The early "installed but closed immediately" history is kept, but marked as superseded rather than reading as current state.

ACCEPTANCE.md

  • Drops No GitHub workflow execution is claimed. and records the actual run: https://github.com/balcsida/plezy/actions/runs/35648745086, tag tizen-v2.20.1-rc2, both jobs green.
  • Adds the first install sourced from a published pre-release rather than a local build, with TPK SHA-256 a76d6153…, source-input SHA-256 5f2d2403…, revision 16b0ae89, clean tree, hash re-checked inside the deploy container immediately before install. In-place signed upgrade, no uninstall, no data cleared.
  • Records the operator's confirmation that the sidebar fullscreen toggle is gone and playback works, explicitly as observation rather than measurement.
  • Removes the now-completed Run the checked-in GitHub workflow and record its actual run URL. item.

What is deliberately not claimed

Independent cryptographic verification and Samsung entitlement stay open, and the device-matrix rows are untouched. inspection.json still reports cryptographic_signature_verified: false and tv_installation_verified: false; the text now says explicitly that a later successful install does not retroactively change a build-time structural report.

Retail sdbd refuses arbitrary shell verbs, so process liveness was never confirmed from the CLI — only applist and was_execute are available. That limitation is stated rather than glossed over.

AI assistance

Written with Claude Opus 5 via Claude Code, per CONTRIBUTING.md.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@balcsida
balcsida merged commit f0b5c85 into feat/tizen-6-tv Sep 21, 2026
2 checks passed
@balcsida
balcsida deleted the docs/tizen-rc2-evidence branch September 21, 2026 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant