Add a Makefile for convenience

[jbampton]

https://pre-commit.com/#4-optional-run-against-all-the-files

https://pre-commit.com/#3-install-the-git-hook-scripts

https://pre-commit.com/#pre-commit-autoupdate

Description

The Makefile will contain the three main commands for using pre-commit locally.

At least this gives you a quickstart and place to see and run the pre-commit commands.

Makefiles can be very handy perhaps in future more commands can be added.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_(software)

refs apache/sedona#1183

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.65%. Comparing base (659f675) to head (6168570).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #8491   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     19.64%   19.65%           
- Complexity    19790    19792    +2     
=========================================
  Files          6368     6368           
  Lines        574889   574889           
  Branches      70353    70353           
=========================================
+ Hits         112962   112969    +7     
+ Misses       449656   449651    -5     
+ Partials      12271    12269    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests	20.92% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DaanHoogland]

ah, you are from the makestory :D

[DaanHoogland]

looks ok, I'm not sure of the use yet. can you explain the framework in use ; yarn, make. pre-commit? is this only for use in GHA?

[yadvr]

-1 - we've GitHub actions for this, and I don't expect people to run it manually on their systems.

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[DaanHoogland]

-1 - we've GitHub actions for this, and I don't expect people to run it manually on their systems.

I actually would expect seasoned developers to run this depending on the kind of changes they are making. that is to say the checks. if we add them to the pom file somehow that could work as well.

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[nvazquez]

Hi @jbampton is this PR ready for review or is it still in progress?

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds a repository-root Makefile to provide a simple local developer entrypoint for common pre-commit workflows, complementing the existing pre-commit documentation and CI workflow.

Changes:

• Introduces make check to run pre-commit against all files.
• Adds make checkinstall to install the git hook scripts.
• Adds make checkupdate to autoupdate pre-commit hook revisions.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[jbampton]

Hi @jbampton is this PR ready for review or is it still in progress?

Hey @nvazquez yes this PR is now ready for review

[nvazquez]

Thanks @jbampton

Hi @yadvr @DaanHoogland can you please have a second review on this PR?