Skip to content

docs: fix broken star history chart by using a new provider - #13844

Open
Mubelotix wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mubelotix:main
Open

docs: fix broken star history chart by using a new provider#13844
Mubelotix wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Mubelotix:main

Conversation

@Mubelotix

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The star history chart in the README is currently broken because GitHub now restricts the stargazer API to repository owners only. This change points the image and link to star-history.dera.page, a token-free alternative that requires no extra configuration or API tokens.

The star history chart is currently broken because GitHub restricts
stargazer queries to repository owners only. Switch the badge and link
to star-history.dera.page, a token-free alternative.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 10, 2026 19:55
@boring-cyborg

boring-cyborg Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache CloudStack community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
Here are some useful points:

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the README’s “Star History” badge/link to use an alternative star-history chart provider, addressing the currently broken chart caused by GitHub stargazer API access restrictions.

Changes:

  • Switched the Star History SVG image URL to https://star-history.dera.page/svg?...
  • Updated the Star History link target to https://star-history.dera.page/#...

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm (readme text only)

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.64%. Comparing base (cced071) to head (05d027d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13844      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.64%   19.64%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    19786    19786              
============================================
  Files          6368     6368              
  Lines        574889   574889              
  Branches      70353    70353              
============================================
- Hits         112957   112951       -6     
- Misses       449660   449666       +6     
  Partials      12272    12272              
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests 20.92% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants