Skip to content

Enroll openvswitch - #976

Open
apconole wants to merge 1 commit into
anthropics:mainfrom
apconole:main
Open

apconole wants to merge 1 commit into
anthropics:mainfrom
apconole:main

Conversation

@apconole

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Enrol projects/<name>

I have verified each of the following before submitting this project (tick each box by changing [ ] to [x]):

  • I am a core maintainer of this project.
  • I accept the OSS Scanner terms.
  • I confirm that I believe my project meets the inclusion criteria and is an established project that users depend on.
  • project.yaml follows the README (one project per PR; tools/validate.py passes locally).
  • tools/check <name> builds the project, and its tests run in the shell that follows.
  • primary_contact must be the email address of the primary security contact.
  • There is a Dockerfile that builds the project (required) in one of two places: in the project's repository at the path dockerfile: names, or next to project.yaml in this repo.

To change an enrolment, edit project.yaml; to pause reports, set disabled: true; to withdraw the project, remove projects/<name>/.

Context (optional): if you believe it is not obvious why your project qualifies for our inclusion criteria, you may write a brief note here to explain why you feel it does.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Enrolment triage: projects/openvswitch

Repository: openvswitch/ovs · opened by apconole

Check Result
✅ Repository created 12 years ago, last push 4 days ago
ℹ️ Stars / forks 4,031 stars · 2,017 forks · 347 watching
ℹ️ Outside participants 37 people from outside the project opened 50 of the last 50 issues and pull requests
ℹ️ Criticality score 0.70 on the OpenSSF scale of 0 to 1
signalscreated_since 210, updated_since 0, contributor_count 757, org_count 8, commit_frequency 6.6, recent_releases_count 14, closed_issues_count 0, updated_issues_count 0, comment_frequency 0, dependents_count 124,832
ℹ️ Package rank by downloads: nothing from this repository found in the top 15,000 on PyPI
✅ License Apache-2.0
⚠️ Opened by an active maintainer no maintainer role visible; 8 commits in the last 12 months; #18 contributor
ℹ️ Contact in SECURITY.md no SECURITY.md to check security@openvswitch.org against
⚠️ OSS-Fuzz in OSS-Fuzz as openvswitch, whose contacts do not include security@openvswitch.org (its primary contact is blp@ovn.org)
ℹ️ .oss-scanner/ in the repository not present; the Dockerfile is in this pull request
✅ Pull request scope only this project's directory
✅ tools/validate.py passes
✅ Checklist all 7 ticked

Automated, from public data, to help reviewers. Enrolment is decided case by case against the criteria. If you think we got something wrong, please tell us in a reply.

@richardfontana

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sb- @carlini @punitshah @srxzr-ant @aterzis-ant Hi I am a lawyer for Red Hat where @apconole works and their work on OVS is Red Hat-related. I am wondering why @apconole is being asked to sign the CLA given that @apconole is not actually contributing any code to the repository. Is a submitted project actually being treated in some sense as a "Contribution" under the CLA? Or is signing the CLA basically a formality here that would only get triggered in the event @apconole actually made a substantive contribution of code or documentation etc. to this repository?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants