Repository navigation
plan(review-on-done): record authenticity is an explicit phase - #108
Merged
Merged
Conversation
A review record in the author's working tree proves nothing on its own; the author can write its own LGTM. Phase 1b makes the identity claim true: written only by a tool with the authenticated reviewer identity, path fenced against model writes, driver checks reviewer != author, independence surfaced. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template. What needs to be fixed:
Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed. If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know. |
|
Hey! Your PR title Please update it to start with one of:
Where See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs only (one tasks.md). Found while reviewing the review-record reader (#107): the record lives in the author's working tree, so as a bare file it proves nothing, because the author's model can write its own LGTM. Phase 1b makes the identity claim true: written only by a tool with the authenticated reviewer identity, the path fenced against model writes, the driver refusing reviewer == author, independence surfaced to policy, and an observed-red forgery test.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code