Repository navigation
fix(middlewareNode): bump nodemailer 6.7.8 -> 10.0.1 (Issue 4) - #242
Open
Deepesh-Katudia wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Deepesh-Katudia wants to merge 1 commit into
Deepesh-Katudia wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
4 of 12 tasks
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The upgrade introduces a Node.js runtime requirement shift (nodemailer now requires Node >=20) that should be explicitly enforced in the package metadata to avoid deploy/runtime mismatches.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Pull request overview
This PR upgrades nodemailer in the middlewareNode package to the 10.x line as part of a stacked dependency/security update series, updating both the declared dependency range and the lockfile resolution.
Changes:
- Bump
middlewareNode’snodemailerdependency from^6.7.8to^10.0.1. - Regenerate
middlewareNode/package-lock.jsonsonodemailerresolves to a 10.x release and updates its recorded engine requirements.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| middlewareNode/package.json | Updates the nodemailer dependency range to ^10.0.1. |
| middlewareNode/package-lock.json | Updates the lockfile to the resolved nodemailer 10.x package and its metadata (including Node engine requirement). |
Review details
Files not reviewed (1)
- middlewareNode/package-lock.json: Generated file
- Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
- Comments generated: 2
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
| "node-nlp": "^4.27.0", | ||
| "node-schedule": "^2.1.1", | ||
| "nodemailer": "^6.7.8", | ||
| "nodemailer": "^10.0.1", |
Comment on lines
+7514
to
7518
| "version": "10.0.10", | ||
| "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nodemailer/-/nodemailer-10.0.10.tgz", | ||
| "integrity": "sha512-He9XskOFms62SyAKkLu8CcGcYHAo+BSHSsORI8s4PJH8qZgZY4L4lDfvyN0twvmbpyG+eGrxpyBlskj9d9rJ8A==", | ||
| "license": "MIT-0", | ||
| "engines": { |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Bump nodemailer 6.7.8 -> 10.0.1 in
middlewareNode, isolated in its own PR so it can be reviewed and reverted on its own.Part of a stacked series. Merge in order: audit-fix -> axios -> nodemailer -> googleapis -> uuid -> node-nlp. Each PR targets the previous branch, so its diff shows only its own bump; After merging each one, click "Delete branch" (this repo does not auto-delete merged branches). That makes GitHub retarget the next PR to
mainand run CI on it; if the branch is not deleted, the next PR must be retargeted tomainby hand before merging, or it will merge into a dead branch. (3/6, stacked on #241)Type of Change
Key Changes
middlewareNode/package.json: one-line range change; lockfile updated accordingly.Testing
node -e "require(...)"of the package (catches CommonJS/ESM breakage that Jest mocks can hide)npm ciBugs Fixed (if applicable)
npm auditafter this PR: 6 findings (0 critical, 3 high)TODO (Follow-up Work)
Additional Notes
Version vetted by @THRISHMA2424 on
dependancyFix; regenerated fresh off current main.