Repository navigation
docs: promote CHANGELOG Unreleased (post-0.2.0) to 0.3.0 - #110
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Move bullets added after the v0.2.0 tag into ## 0.3.0 - 2026-10-30 and backfill ## 0.2.0 - 2026-10-14 from the tag-time Unreleased section. The published v0.3.0 tag and GitHub Release are unchanged. Co-authored-by: Hongsheng Liu <liuhongsheng4@huawei.com>
Birfy
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2026
Birfy
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checked the relocation mechanically against v0.2.0:CHANGELOG.md (tag 0a912ba), v0.3.0:CHANGELOG.md (113ef26, identical to current main) and this head (358998d):
main's## Unreleasedhas 58 bullets; this head has 17 under0.3.0 - 2026-10-30and 41 under0.2.0 - 2026-10-14. Their union equals main's Unreleased exactly, with no duplicates and no dropped or reworded text.- None of the 0.3.0 bullets were in Unreleased at the v0.2.0 tag, and every 0.2.0 bullet was.
- Every bullet keeps its Added / Changed / Fixed subsection,
## 0.1.0is byte-identical, and the diff touchesCHANGELOG.mdonly. Both tags still point where they did.
Not adding a bullet for #72 is right.
Non-blocking nit: the PR adds a blank line between every bullet in the 0.3.0 and 0.2.0 sections (26 to 72 blank lines in the file). ## 0.1.0 and the rest of the file use tight lists, and on GitHub the blank lines turn these into loose lists (each item in its own paragraph). They also make this diff look bigger than the move it really is. I'd drop them for consistency, but it's fine to merge as is.
Approving. CI was still running when I reviewed, but the change is docs-only.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Required human contributor answers
What outcome are you trying to achieve?
Answer: Put the post-v0.2.0
CHANGELOG.mdUnreleased bullets under## 0.3.0 - 2026-10-30, and keep leftover 0.2.0-era notes out of that section. Source: this change request, which matches the cutting note on the published v0.3.0 release.What is the highest-leverage variable for that outcome?
Answer: Which Unreleased bullets were added after the v0.2.0 tag (
0a912ba, 2026-10-14) versus which were already in Unreleased at that tag. Source: this change request.How will this work move that variable rather than create busywork?
Answer: Relocate those bullets verbatim. Post-tag bullets go to 0.3.0. Tag-time Unreleased bullets, which the published v0.2.0 notes point at as the full list, are backfilled under
## 0.2.0 - 2026-10-14. No version bump, tag, or release edit. Source: this change request.Who is the customer or user, and what do they actually need?
Answer: Readers of
CHANGELOG.mdand the already-published v0.3.0 release, who need the notes under the version that shipped. Source: this change request.After answering the four questions: is a PR needed at all to achieve this outcome?
Human decision and rationale (or explicit source reference): Yes. This change request asks for a PR. The v0.3.0 release was already cut at
113ef26without promoting Unreleased, and that tag must stay where it is. A docs-only PR is how the headings land onmain.For a bug fix: link actual observed failure evidence.
Evidence: Not applicable. This is changelog hygiene, not a bug fix.
Why
v0.3.0was published on 2026-10-30 at113ef26while## Unreleasedstill held both the post-0.2.0 notes and the 0.2.0-era notes that were never promoted at the 2026-10-14 tag (0a912ba). The published release says to cut only the post-0.2.0 bullets.How
CHANGELOG.mdonly. A bullet whose text is absent fromv0.2.0:CHANGELOG.mdmoved under## 0.3.0 - 2026-10-30(Added / Changed / Fixed). A bullet present at the v0.2.0 tag moved under## 0.2.0 - 2026-10-14.## Unreleasedis empty.## 0.1.0is unchanged.pyproject.tomlis not bumped. No git tag or GitHub Release was created, moved, or deleted.What
## 0.3.0 - 2026-10-30: the 17 bullets added after v0.2.0. Served OneJev and its shared HTTP deadline,jev-vl-servedand trace scoping, the TypeSafejev-1.13.0/TYPESAFE_MODEL/requested_modelpin, unifiedChoice/Noulconfidence, injection-guard withhold/coverage/labelled-set behavior,injection-public.jsonl, the BrowseSafe sample, MCP titles/hints/schemas and long-run progress/cancel,mcp>=1.26,<2,s1a probe --order, the offline public231 quality consumer, duplicate--optionrejection, and ticket JSONL errors that name the dataset and line.## 0.2.0 - 2026-10-14: the 41 Unreleased bullets already in the file at the v0.2.0 tag (CLM, rethink/recovery, omnijev, laya-served, Windows CI, and the rest of that cut).#72(changed-image decision replay) merged after v0.2.0 and is a v0.3.0 release highlight, but that PR did not add a CHANGELOG bullet. This change does not invent one.Verification
Compared bullet text with
git show v0.2.0:CHANGELOG.mdand withCHANGELOG.mdat113ef26: 17 post-tag bullets in 0.3.0, 41 tag-time bullets in 0.2.0, no overlap, no dropped or rewritten bullets, and## 0.1.0byte-identical.git diff origin/main --statisCHANGELOG.mdonly.git ls-remote --tags origin v0.2.0 v0.3.0still points at0a912baand113ef26.uv run ruff format --check . && uv run ruff check . && uv run ty check— not run; this diff does not change Pythonuv run pytest -qandscripts/smoke.sh— not run; same reasonCHANGELOG.mdand the docs say what the code does now — changelog headings now match the published cuts; no other docs changedDemo / evidence
CONTRIBUTING.md, Agent video demos).