You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Cycle 5 research gate: select the next evidence-backed improvement #29
Complete Cycle 5 as a bounded, evidence-led cycle: refresh AI and gaming workflow reports, audit current OpenController ownership and gaps, rank candidates, then select one measurable improvement or record a no-build decision. End with independent review, required checks, merge, roadmap closeout, and a Cycle 6 research gate.
Cycle 4 implementation and closeout are complete: issue #22 merged in PR #25 at 8eb744c, and PR #30 closed gate #23. This gate is active.
Builder reports about 7 seconds per screenshot/vision/decision/tool cycle; staggered three agents produced a move every 2–3 seconds and an automatic opening action established tempo.
Timed game agents may benefit from reusable low-overhead actions, but controller plumbing cannot speed model reasoning. One self-reported project.
One hardware report estimates a polling contribution, one project requests a browser/input-family latency harness, and one Chrome proposal describes event-driven input.
Sparse adjacent evidence; no OpenController-specific latency failure or adoption proof.
These are dated public reports and requests, not prevalence estimates. External host and application failures are not evidence of defects in OpenController.
Coverage limits
HN Algolia and OpenAI Discourse JSON were reachable for targeted searches. Reddit, Google search, and SDL Discourse search returned HTTP 403.
Steam Community search worked, but the relevant results found were old and low value for this decision.
GitHub issue/API searches covered Steam for Linux, SDL-related candidates, Selkies/ROMM, Jellyfin Web, Cockpit, Tanks, and latency seeds. Search was targeted, not exhaustive.
No clear current recurring AI-agent-specific controller problem was found. No result count, comments, or reactions are used as a prevalence estimate. Accessibility-community coverage remains open.
Repository audit and ranking
Audit target: integrated main at 62e8b95, including the core ControllerHub, browser exports, native bridge identity, tests, latency fields, and current README. The ControllerHub README called hub.createController, which the public class does not implement; it exposes add/get/has/list/states/disconnectAll. Existing tests covered two dry-run controllers with distinct IDs and profile entries but did not assert separate state, duplicate-ID rejection, or reuse after disconnectAll. The SDK does not discover physical devices or own browser/OS slot identity.
Direct first-party docs/API mismatch plus missing duplicate-ID and lifecycle tests. External reports show a related ownership-conflict category but do not prove prevalence or an OpenController defect.
Low/medium, about 1–2 days. High confidence in the repository mismatch; low confidence in prevalence.
Some status latency is supplied rather than measured; no end-to-end SDK boundary was established.
Medium; sparse adjacent evidence and clock/overclaim risk.
Decision and implementation DAG
Selection: issue #27 corrected the README API example, added a typed runnable counterpart, made duplicate rejection cover concurrent additions and failed construction cleanup, explicitly asserted per-controller state isolation, tested ID reuse after disconnectAll, and documented caller-owned IDs plus the requirement to await additions before disconnectAll. It does not add physical discovery, automatic mapping, native adapter sharing, or host/browser reconnect claims.
Issues #26 and #28 remain deferred. Issue #27 closed when PR #32 merged; PR #31 records the decision. This gate now awaits its roadmap closeout. Cycle 6 gate #35 is open and blocked by both #29 and selected implementation #20.
flowchart TD
A[Cycle 4 closeout PR #30; gate #23 closed] --> B[Refresh public evidence]
B --> C[Audit main 62e8b95]
C --> D[Select #27; defer #26 and #28]
D --> E[Correct ControllerHub docs and test logical ID lifecycle]
E --> F[Independent review and required checks]
F --> G[Merge implementation PR stack]
G --> H[Roadmap closeout and Cycle 6 gate]
H --> I[Close Cycle 5 gate #29]
Loading
Checklist
Refresh dated reports across AI/game-agent forums, HN, OpenAI Developer Community, Steam, GitHub projects, and related controller workflows; record Reddit, Google, SDL Discourse, Steam Community, and accessibility coverage limits.
Record source dates, workflows, stated workarounds or absence, evidence strength, and limits; count the Selkies/ROMM cross-post once and make no prevalence claim.
Audit current main, ControllerHub docs/code/tests, browser exports, native identity, and latency measurement boundaries.
Goal
Complete Cycle 5 as a bounded, evidence-led cycle: refresh AI and gaming workflow reports, audit current OpenController ownership and gaps, rank candidates, then select one measurable improvement or record a no-build decision. End with independent review, required checks, merge, roadmap closeout, and a Cycle 6 research gate.
Cycle 4 implementation and closeout are complete: issue #22 merged in PR #25 at 8eb744c, and PR #30 closed gate #23. This gate is active.
Fresh source log (2026-10-04)
These are dated public reports and requests, not prevalence estimates. External host and application failures are not evidence of defects in OpenController.
Coverage limits
Repository audit and ranking
Audit target: integrated main at 62e8b95, including the core ControllerHub, browser exports, native bridge identity, tests, latency fields, and current README. The ControllerHub README called hub.createController, which the public class does not implement; it exposes add/get/has/list/states/disconnectAll. Existing tests covered two dry-run controllers with distinct IDs and profile entries but did not assert separate state, duplicate-ID rejection, or reuse after disconnectAll. The SDK does not discover physical devices or own browser/OS slot identity.
Decision and implementation DAG
Selection: issue #27 corrected the README API example, added a typed runnable counterpart, made duplicate rejection cover concurrent additions and failed construction cleanup, explicitly asserted per-controller state isolation, tested ID reuse after disconnectAll, and documented caller-owned IDs plus the requirement to await additions before disconnectAll. It does not add physical discovery, automatic mapping, native adapter sharing, or host/browser reconnect claims.
Issues #26 and #28 remain deferred. Issue #27 closed when PR #32 merged; PR #31 records the decision. This gate now awaits its roadmap closeout. Cycle 6 gate #35 is open and blocked by both #29 and selected implementation #20.
Checklist
release:checkpassing. Issue Fix ControllerHub docs and test logical ID lifecycle #27 closed on merge ate6d5769.Acceptance