Skip to content

Upload to and read from robostack-noetic instead of robostack-staging - #567

Merged
Tobias-Fischer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
noetic-own-channel
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Tobias-Fischer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
noetic-own-channel

Conversation

@Tobias-Fischer

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

noetic now builds against, skips existing packages from, and uploads to robostack-noetic directly, instead of robostack-staging:

  • pixi.toml: upload, build, build-one and build_continue_on_failure;
  • vinca.yaml: skip_existing;
  • .scripts/build_unix.sh, .scripts/build_win.bat and testpr.yml: the -c channel.

Until now, users only got these builds through the hourly copy job (staging → robostack-noetic) in RoboStack/robostack.github.io. RoboStack/robostack.github.io#205 removes that job, so the two should merge together.

robostack-noetic already has every current noetic build: the copy job copied everything built since 2025-01-01, e.g. eigenpy 3.12.0 build 24 on all platforms. So skip_existing against it doesn't trigger rebuilds.

Before merging:

  • The ANACONDA_API_TOKEN secret of this repository must be allowed to upload to robostack-noetic (the copy job used a separate token).
  • Drop the empty [skip ci] head commit, so the squash commit on main doesn't skip the post-merge build.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Tobias-Fischer and others added 2 commits October 22, 2026 11:07
robostack-staging only reached users of robostack-noetic through the hourly
copy job in RoboStack/robostack.github.io, which goes away with
RoboStack/robostack.github.io#205. robostack-noetic already has every
current noetic build (the copy job ran since 2025-01-01), so skip_existing
against it doesn't trigger rebuilds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Tobias-Fischer
Tobias-Fischer merged commit dea730c into main Oct 22, 2026
5 checks passed
@Tobias-Fischer
Tobias-Fischer deleted the noetic-own-channel branch October 22, 2026 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant