Skip to content

Broken Links Found in Documentation #597

Description

@github-actions

Link Check Report

🚨 0 broken link(s) and 3 redirect(s) were found in the documentation.

Details:

  • Repository: QuantEcon/lecture-python-programming
  • Workflow: Link Checker [Anaconda, Linux]
  • Run ID: 37386344602
  • Commit: b0b0b56
  • Branch: main
  • Date: 2026-10-05T23:12:48.455Z

Link Check Summary

  • Total broken links: 0
  • Total redirects found: 3
  • Links skipped by ignore-patterns: 7

AI-Powered Suggestions

_site/python_by_example.html - AI Suggestions:
🤖 https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#string-methods
Issue: Redirected 1 times
💡 redirect_update: https://docs.python.org/3/builtins/stdtypes.html#string-methods
Reason: Update to final destination to avoid 1 redirect(s)

_site/functions.html - AI Suggestions:
🤖 https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html
Issue: Redirected 1 times
💡 redirect_update: https://docs.python.org/3/builtins/functions.html
Reason: Update to final destination to avoid 1 redirect(s)

_site/getting_started.html - AI Suggestions:
🤖 https://research.google.com/colaboratory/
Issue: Redirected 2 times
💡 redirect_update: https://colab.research.google.com/
Reason: Update to final destination to avoid 2 redirect(s)


Next Steps:

  1. Review the broken links listed above
  2. Update or remove broken links from the source files
  3. Consider applying AI suggestions for better alternatives
  4. Re-run the link check to verify fixes

Note: This issue was automatically created by the AI-Powered Link Checker Action. While it stays open, later runs refresh this body in place rather than opening a new issue, so the report above always reflects the most recent run.

Please close this issue once all broken links have been addressed.

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething is wrong or broken in a lecture or build
    documentationRepo docs and contributor meta (not lecture content)
    broken-linksLink checker found dead links
    on Aug 3, 2026
  2. mmcky commented on Aug 4, 2026

    @mmcky
    Contributor

    Both flagged redirects are now addressed in source:

    The ignore-patterns from #592 are confirmed working in production: 7 links skipped, zero FRED false positives, and this is the first report since the cleanup — 0 broken links.

    Suggested close condition: after #598 merges and the next publish goes out, the following weekly run should report clean; close then. (While open, the action refreshes this body in place, so no duplicate issues accumulate.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    broken-linksLink checker found dead linksbugSomething is wrong or broken in a lecture or builddocumentationRepo docs and contributor meta (not lecture content)

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions