Skip to content

test: markets auth snapshot#1022

Merged
greatest0fallt1me merged 1 commit into
Predictify-org:masterfrom
Kingsley4867:task/markets-authsnap-v7
Jul 26, 2026
Merged

test: markets auth snapshot#1022
greatest0fallt1me merged 1 commit into
Predictify-org:masterfrom
Kingsley4867:task/markets-authsnap-v7

Conversation

@Kingsley4867

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes #914

Pull Request Description

📋 Basic Information

Type of Change

Please select the type of change this PR introduces:

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🧪 Test addition/update
  • 🔧 Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • 🔒 Security fix
  • 🎨 UI/UX improvement
  • 🚀 Deployment/Infrastructure change

Related Issues

Closes #914

Priority Level

  • 🔴 Critical (blocking other development)
  • 🟡 High (significant impact)
  • 🟢 Medium (moderate impact)
  • 🔵 Low (minor improvement)

📝 Detailed Description

What does this PR do?

This PR adds per-entrypoint authorization snapshot tests for the markets contract in contracts/markets/tests/auth_snap.rs. The new tests verify that each state-changing entrypoint requires the expected authorization and provide regression coverage for future changes.

Why is this change needed?

Authorization requirements are a critical security guarantee for the markets contract. These snapshot tests make the expected authorization behavior explicit and help prevent accidental regressions by failing whenever authorization requirements change unexpectedly.

How was this tested?

  • Added authorization snapshot tests for the markets contract.
  • Executed the relevant test suite with cargo test.
  • Verified that the generated snapshots match the expected authorization behavior.

Alternative Solutions Considered

Individual authorization assertions for each entrypoint were considered, but snapshot tests provide clearer regression detection while requiring less maintenance as authorization behavior evolves.


🏗️ Smart Contract Specific

Contract Changes

  • Core contract logic modified
  • Oracle integration changes (Pyth/Reflector)
  • New functions added
  • Existing functions modified
  • Storage structure changes
  • Events added/modified
  • Error handling improved
  • Gas optimization
  • Access control changes
  • Admin functions modified
  • Fee structure changes

Oracle Integration

  • Pyth oracle integration affected
  • Reflector oracle integration affected
  • Oracle configuration changes
  • Price feed handling modified
  • Oracle fallback mechanisms
  • Price validation logic

Market Resolution Logic

  • Hybrid resolution algorithm changed
  • Dispute mechanism modified
  • Fee structure updated
  • Voting mechanism changes
  • Community weight calculation
  • Oracle weight calculation

Security Considerations

  • Access control reviewed
  • Reentrancy protection
  • Input validation
  • Overflow/underflow protection
  • Oracle manipulation protection

🧪 Testing

Test Coverage

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • All tests passing locally
  • Manual testing completed
  • Edge cases covered
  • Error conditions tested
  • Oracle integration tested
  • Gas usage optimized
  • Cross-contract interactions tested

Test Results

# Replace with your actual output

cargo test

<insert full cargo test output here>

Manual Testing Steps

  1. Added authorization snapshot tests in contracts/markets/tests/auth_snap.rs.
  2. Ran cargo test.
  3. Confirmed all authorization snapshots match the expected output.
  4. Verified that all state-changing entrypoints are covered by the snapshot tests.

📚 Documentation

Documentation Updates

  • README updated
  • Code comments added/updated
  • API documentation updated
  • Examples updated
  • Deployment instructions updated
  • Contributing guidelines updated
  • Architecture documentation updated

Breaking Changes

Breaking Changes:

  • None.

Migration Guide:

No migration is required.


🔍 Code Quality

Code Review Checklist

  • Code follows Rust/Soroban best practices
  • Self-review completed
  • No unnecessary code duplication
  • Error handling is appropriate
  • Security considerations addressed
  • Performance implications considered
  • Code is readable and well-commented
  • Variable names are descriptive
  • Functions are focused and small
  • Logging/monitoring added where needed

Performance Impact

  • Gas Usage: None (test-only change)
  • Storage Impact: None
  • Computational Complexity: None

Security Review

  • No obvious security vulnerabilities
  • Access controls reviewed
  • No sensitive data exposed
  • Oracle data properly validated
  • Input validation in place

🚀 Deployment & Integration

Deployment Notes

  • Network: N/A
  • Contract Address: N/A
  • Migration Required: No
  • Special Instructions: None.

Integration Points

  • Backward compatibility maintained
  • Frontend integration considered
  • API changes documented
  • Third-party integrations updated

📊 Impact Assessment

User Impact

  • End Users: No user-facing changes.
  • Developers: Improved regression protection for authorization behavior.
  • Admins: No impact.

Business Impact

  • Revenue: None.
  • User Experience: No direct impact.
  • Technical Debt: Reduced by strengthening automated test coverage.

✅ Final Checklist

Pre-Submission

  • Code follows Rust/Soroban best practices
  • All CI checks passing
  • No breaking changes (or breaking changes are documented)
  • Ready for review
  • PR description is complete and accurate
  • All required sections filled out
  • Test results included
  • Documentation updated

Review Readiness

  • Self-review completed
  • Code is clean and well-formatted
  • Commit messages are clear and descriptive
  • Branch is up to date with main
  • No merge conflicts

📸 Screenshots (if applicable)

N/A


🔗 Additional Resources


💬 Notes for Reviewers

Please pay special attention to:

  • Whether every state-changing entrypoint is covered by the authorization snapshots.
  • Whether the snapshot output accurately reflects the current authorization requirements.

Questions for reviewers:

  • Is there any additional entrypoint that should be included in the authorization snapshot coverage?

Thank you for your contribution to Predictify! 🚀

@drips-wave

drips-wave Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Kingsley4867 Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@greatest0fallt1me

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merged via direct push to master (admin)

@greatest0fallt1me
greatest0fallt1me merged commit 3983109 into Predictify-org:master Jul 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add per-entrypoint auth snapshot for markets (v7)

3 participants