Skip to content

Audit N4: require exact missing WireGuard secret rejection in public source CI - #6

Merged
Olize merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/verify-missing-vpn-secret-failure
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Olize merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/verify-missing-vpn-secret-failure

Conversation

@Olize

@Olize Olize commented Oct 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Improve the independently protected public source-alpha test without changing application runtime code. Audit N4 found the existing docker run negative test treated any non-zero exit as PASS. The revised test supplies synthetic format-valid WireGuard address, relay address, port and public key but no private key secret, executes the isolated container with --network none --cap-drop=ALL, and requires precisely ERROR: WireGuard key secret missing. rather than an arbitrary crash. Build signature and source-only boundaries unchanged; no real secrets, GHCR push, dev/private links, release or production changes. Draft until mandatory public source-build CI passes.

@Olize
Olize marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2026 00:33
@Olize
Olize merged commit 2d62f15 into main Oct 22, 2026
1 check passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-22T00:34:48.206044Z 51669cd Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant