Expose hedgehog function for testing#158
Draft
micahhahn wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR exposes a new function from the
Testmodule calledhedgehog. This function is almost identical to thefuzzfunction except that we accept theGentype that underlies theFuzzopaque type:This allows consumers of the library to use the raw powerful Hedgehog combinators if they need to instead of our Elm-like wrappers.
Why do we need this?
I'm trying to write a Fuzzer for a recursive type that is an extension of a JSON object (for json-render):
A first attempt at a fuzzer might look like:
This of course will cause an infinite recursion.