Repository navigation
Conversation
alneberg
reviewed
Aug 17, 2026
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| function (doc) { | |||
| emit(doc._id); | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we have these in quite a few databases, but I don't think they're actually needed. Statusdb allows direct lookup of the doc._id without this view. Or am I missing something?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, right. I use this view in the encryption script. I could rewrite it, but maybe it's ok to keep that way for now?
ssjunnebo
merged commit Aug 19, 2026
bbfdecf
into
NationalGenomicsInfrastructure:main
1 check passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds archiving views. The validation script removed some seemingly deprecated dbs from the views config.