Skip to content

Doug's C++ refactoring review - #101

Open
d-torrance wants to merge 5 commits into
MichaelABurr:aringsfrom
d-torrance:arings-doug-review
Open

d-torrance wants to merge 5 commits into
MichaelABurr:aringsfrom
d-torrance:arings-doug-review

Conversation

@d-torrance

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

All AI for now. Still awaiting human comments

d-torrance and others added 5 commits October 20, 2026 11:50
Review of e/unit-tests/NCGroebnerTest.cpp against STYLE.md and
AGENTS.md, in PR4441-NCGroebner-review/.  The -claude file is the full
review written with Claude Opus 5.5; the -doug file is the summary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Review of the 13 files in the "Tests: other engine" unit (BRP-test.cpp
through basics-test.cpp) against STYLE.md and AGENTS.md, in
PR4441-other-engine-review/.  The -claude file is the full review
written with Claude Opus 5.5; the -doug file is the summary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Second-reviewer points not already in Anton's review, in
PR4441-CC-CCC-review/.  The -doug-claude file is the full review
written with Claude Opus 5.5; the -doug file is the summary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The rewritten MemoryBlock test writes values only after
shrinkLastAllocate and never checks the address, so it can't catch the
failure that F4's two callers depend on not happening.  Add this as a
point for the PR, and correct the "Good" entries, which said the test
covered shrinking.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant