Bayes Test Kit is a Python package for Bayesian Bradley-Terry model along with utilities for multi-algorithm multi-dataset statistical evaluation. It also ships the two Bayesian t-tests of Benavoli et al. (2017) for comparing two algorithms: the correlated t-test (one dataset) and the hierarchical correlated t-test (many datasets).
You can install Bayes Test Kit via pip:
pip install bayes-testkitIf needed, you can also install the latest development version directly from GitHub:
pip install git+https://github.com/scikit-fingerprints/bbt-testTo generate results from BBT model you need to first fit posterior MCMC samples. Bayes Test Kit supports unpaired (1 metric readout per algorithm per dataset) and paired (multiple metric readouts per algorithm per dataset) data.
For hands-on example of using the package, check out our example notebook: 01_simple_bbt_comparison.ipynb.
Start with single dataframe in shape (n_datasets, n_algorithms), optionally this dataframe can contain a dataset column:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({
"dataset": ["ds1", "ds2", "ds3"],
"alg1": [0.8, 0.75, 0.9],
"alg2": [0.7, 0.8, 0.85],
"alg3": [0.9, 0.95, 0.88],
})To generate data for BBT model, fit the BBTTest model with the dataframe
from btk import BBTTest
model = BBTTest(
absolute_tie_threshold=0.01, # What counts as a tie, in the units of your metric.
# Here, a difference in score below 0.01 is a tie. Default is None (no ties).
).fit(
df,
dataset_col="dataset", # If dataset column is present, specify it here
)The two are on different scales and are not interchangeable.
- Use
absolute_tie_thresholdwhen you have one score per model per dataset. It is a difference in the units of your metric. - Use
local_rope_effect_sizewhen you have repeated scores per dataset (or passdata_sd) — it is a Cohen's d, a multiple of the observed spread.
By default BBT assumes that the goal of the evaluation is to maximize the metric (e.g. when reporting F1 score or AUROC). In cases, when metrics reported in the dataframe should be minimized (e.g. RMSE), you can set the parameter maximize in BBTTest to False:
model = BBTTest(
absolute_tie_threshold=0.01,
maximize=False, # Set to False if the metric should be minimized
).fit(
df,
dataset_col="dataset",
)BBTTest model supports two variants of input data for paired case, either a single dataframe with multiple rows per algorithm per dataset, or a pair of dataframes, one defining mean performance per algorithm, and the second with standard deviations.
import pandas as pd
from btk import BBTTest
df = pd.DataFrame({
"dataset": ["ds1", "ds1", "ds1", "ds2", "ds2", "ds2", "ds3", "ds3", "ds3"],
"alg1": [0.8, 0.82, 0.79, 0.75, 0.77, 0.74, 0.9, 0.91, 0.89],
"alg2": [0.7, 0.72, 0.69, 0.8, 0.78, 0.81, 0.85, 0.86, 0.84],
"alg3": [0.9, 0.92, 0.91, 0.95, 0.94, 0.96, 0.88, 0.87, 0.89],
})
model = BBTTest(
local_rope_effect_size=0.4, # A Cohen's d, not a difference in metric units.
# With repeated rows a dataset counts as a win only when the mean of the per-fold
# differences exceeds 0.4 sample standard deviations of those differences
# (Wainer 2023, Eq. 6). With `data_sd` instead, the spread is pooled across the two
# models as sqrt((sd_a^2 + sd_b^2) / 2).
).fit(
df,
dataset_col="dataset",
)Once you obtained a fitted BBTTest model, you can generate statistic dataframe containing information about every hypothesis (i.e. every pair of algorithms). The table includes general statistics in form of mean and delta values, as well as probabilities of one algorithm being better than the other, or being tied. Additionally, by default the table contains weak and strong interpretations of the results based on ROPE values.
stats_df = model.posterior_table(
rope_value=(0.45, 0.55), # Defines ROPE of hypothesis for interpretations
control_model="alg1", # If provided, only hypotheses comparing to control_model will be included
selected_models=["alg2"], # If provided, only hypotheses comparing selected_models will be included
)
print(stats_df)
pair mean delta above_50 in_rope weak_interpretation
0 alg1 > alg2 0.63 0.53 0.75 0.19 UnknownAdditionally, you can generate multiple hypothesis interpretations regarding control model for different ROPE values:
stats_df = model.rope_comparison_control_table(
rope_values=[(0.4, 0.6), (0.45, 0.55), (0.48, 0.52)],
control_model="alg1",
interpretation="weak",
)
print(stats_df)
rope_value better_models equivalent_models worse_models unknown_models
0 (0.4, 0.6) alg3, alg1
1 (0.45, 0.55) alg3, alg1
2 (0.48, 0.52) alg3, alg1For comparing two algorithms, use CorrelatedTTest on the cross-validation folds of a single dataset:
import pandas as pd
from btk import CorrelatedTTest
df = pd.DataFrame({
"fold": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
"alg1": [0.81, 0.83, 0.80, 0.82, 0.84],
"alg2": [0.78, 0.77, 0.79, 0.76, 0.78],
})
model = CorrelatedTTest(rope=0.01).fit(df, fold_col="fold")
model.decision_table()and HierarchicalTTest when the folds come from many datasets:
from btk import HierarchicalTTest
df = pd.DataFrame({
"dataset": ["ds1"] * 3 + ["ds2"] * 3 + ["ds3"] * 3,
"fold": [1, 2, 3] * 3,
"alg1": [0.81, 0.83, 0.80, 0.75, 0.77, 0.74, 0.90, 0.91, 0.89],
"alg2": [0.78, 0.77, 0.79, 0.76, 0.75, 0.73, 0.85, 0.86, 0.84],
})
model = HierarchicalTTest(rope=0.01).fit(df, dataset_col="dataset", fold_col="fold")
model.decision_table()Unlike BBT, rope here is a difference in the units of your metric.
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE.md file for details.